58% approval ratings

Care to explain or is that a private discussion between you and the voices in your rice krispies?

You don't want to hear what they say.

Maine has 4 electoral college votes and a part of Maine was hospitable to Trump's populism. Maine has been solidly Democrat since Reagan's win probably. Achieving the split in the college there for the first time because of a quirk in Maine's laws where it can be split unlike the other 48 states (there is that other similar state) is cute but was it Trump's idea?

I should say, I get the idea, Trump's being the underdog put in more effort. Just I don't see the Maine thing as some genius move.
 
Yes, Walter Mondale for the Dems, what a tiger he was and running with a female VP might have been a bit ahead of his time.

I recall he was from Minnesota? I recon Tom B is from there as he has that special kind of stupid you get in Minnesota.

I quite liked Regan in reality, most did. Regan would be a liberal by 2017 GOP standards anyway. What I don't like is giving credit where it is not due but he did not make himself a mythical figure.

Hmm, the modern democrat supports unregulated abortion, gay marriage, is anti-police, is anti-military, capitulates to terrorist, capitulates to murderous regimes, thinks America's power is bad and undeserved, wants to impose huge taxes, wants to separate people by race, gender, sexual orientation and financial well being, makes everything about race, attacks freedom of speech, and nominates a person who has no vision or ideas for the future, but has different genitalia than previous Presidents so the nomination will be about that.

What exactly would Reagan like about that? Compare Reagan tax cuts to those being peddled by Paul Ryan and it ain't even close, pal.

Today's Republican party would be viewed as liberal by Reagan. You got the shit completely backwards.

We have two parties in the US today. One is a liberal party, the other is left-wing socialist party.
 
Hmm, the modern democrat supports unregulated abortion, gay marriage, is anti-police, is anti-military, capitulates to terrorist, capitulates to murderous regimes, thinks America's power is bad and undeserved, wants to impose huge taxes, wants to separate people by race, gender, sexual orientation and financial well being, makes everything about race, attacks freedom of speech, and nominates a person who has no vision or ideas for the future, but has different genitalia than previous Presidents so the nomination will be about that.

What exactly would Reagan like about that? Compare Reagan tax cuts to those being peddled by Paul Ryan and it ain't even close, pal.

Today's Republican party would be viewed as liberal by Reagan. You got the shit completely backwards.

We have two parties in the US today. One is a liberal party, the other is left-wing socialist party.

You always open with bullshit. Ok 70% BS.
 
You don't want to hear what they say.

Maine has 4 electoral college votes and a part of Maine was hospitable to Trump's populism. Maine has been solidly Democrat since Reagan's win probably. Achieving the split in the college there for the first time because of a quirk in Maine's laws where it can be split unlike the other 48 states (there is that other similar state) is cute but was it Trump's idea?


I see that you have google but what is the original point that I made about Hillary that you are trying to counter or do you even remember or you just want to google around?

My point was that trump assumed that he was bound by the electoral college and campaigned his arse off in any and all places that had electoral votes to be had- within reason, solid lib states not so much, because he was working a strategy- duh. And my point about Hillary was that she did not work her arse off campaigning in general and in some key toss up states in particular. Let me know when you got something new on that which counters those points.
 
What part is bullshit?

There is nothing to respond to here Wildchild. Just ramblings that might make sense to you but make none to me, really I don't understand what you are saying.

Today's Republican party would be viewed as batshit scum by Reagan and a shame to the country if not humanity itself. The Dems are not crowned in glory either.
 
There is nothing to respond to here Wildchild. Just ramblings that might make sense to you but make none to me, really I don't understand what you are saying.

Today's Republican party would be viewed as batshit scum by Reagan and a shame to the country if not humanity itself. The Dems are not crowned in glory either.

You made the claim that Reagan would be viewed as a liberal today. Not me.

The fact of the matter today's republicans would be viewed as liberal by Reagan's standards, not the other way around. As pointed out, look at Reagan's tax cut compared to the crap that is being pushed today. Its not even close.

The point in this post is not terribly difficult to understand.
 
I see that you have google but what is the original point that I made about Hillary that you are trying to counter or do you even remember or you just want to google around?

My point was that trump assumed that he was bound by the electoral college and campaigned his arse off in any and all places that had electoral votes to be had- within reason, solid lib states not so much, because he was working a strategy- duh. And my point about Hillary was that she did not work her arse off campaigning in general and in some key toss up states in particular. Let me know when you got something new on that which counters those points.

I explained before that I had to google how Maine was split and why it was different to other states.

Hillary of course assumed she was bound by the electoral college and campaigned as such. Her campaign was over confident. Trump winning has less to do with him being great and more to do with enough white voters wanting to burn it all down given two lousy choices.

I've spoken to 12 personal acquaintances who voted for him about why. 10 did so as they wanted to break/reset Washington knowing he was a fucking turd. The other two were lightweight idiots who knew nothing about him.
 
I explained before that I had to google how Maine was split and why it was different to other states.

Hillary of course assumed she was bound by the electoral college and campaigned as such. Her campaign was over confident. Trump winning has less to do with him being great and more to do with enough white voters wanting to burn it all down given two lousy choices.

I've spoken to 12 personal acquaintances who voted for him about why. 10 did so as they wanted to break/reset Washington knowing he was a fucking turd. The other two were lightweight idiots who knew nothing about him.

I love how everything with lefties comes down to race. It has nothing to do with race. Hillary Clinton is a horrible person. No matter what Trump does, it is still better than having Hillary.
 
.

Hillary of course assumed she was bound by the electoral college and campaigned as such. Her campaign was over confident. Trump winning has less to do with him being great and more to do with enough white voters wanting to burn it all down given two lousy choices.

.

And that confirms that you share the same dildo-ic view that caused Hillary to lose. She complained endlessly about how white voters who would not vote for anyone who did not look or sound like her or ethnic folks were the cause of people being flaccid about her campaign. Meanthwile, Obama, The Joe Biden, and Bubba were reminding her on an hourly basis that those same white voters in places like Wisconsin and Madison- where she undercampaigned if at all- voted TWICE for a very liberal BLACK GUY. The rest is history. Maybe you can google something up to make it all go away. If you find anything good, send it to Hillary.

BUT WE GOT IT, Hillary didn't campaign and was s loser so we all have to be white racists and misogynists. That's how the script works.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top