Quote from stu:
But you do seem to imagine religious belief is a free pass card allowing the rejection of definitions or reason to get all testy when ignoring the fact there are conventions in this world.
As well as from yourself, there is some of that rejection from one of your own "we" people , who only make up argument through the way theism ever defends its beliefs, arguing from absurd, contradictory, unsupported and dishonest standpoints. As witnessed in this thread and many others like it.
Jem states
So if you have no belief you are not an atheist.
Do you agree?
If so, what is the label supposed to be for someone who has no beliefs ?
It cannot be agnostic , without as you frikin say, "ignoring the fact there are conventions in this world."
Can you explain without getting all testy? Or is the definition to be "turd" as Jem likes to call anyone, when he cannot grasp the meaning of something.
I call someone a turd when they bring my name up as they b.s.
