One is a CFO and the other a IT Consultant worried about Calif Homeless problem while supposedly at work. True beauticians! Bro?Man, you're really angry today, bro. Did you really lose your butt plug?
One is a CFO and the other a IT Consultant worried about Calif Homeless problem while supposedly at work. True beauticians! Bro?Man, you're really angry today, bro. Did you really lose your butt plug?
Look it up..
https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/california_state_spending.html
$25B to LA - almost half of California's $51.5B in state and local welfare expenditures.
LA is the crown jewel - America's poorest big city...
http://laist.com/2014/09/19/los_angeles_is_the_poorest_of_the_m.php
Thanks Libs!
Your report didn't say anything about cumulative spending, it talked about future billion dollar spending by issuing bonds. There is no evidence to say that LA has already spent billions.
One is a CFO and the other a IT Consultant worried about Calif Homeless problem while supposedly at work. True beauticians! Bro?
I hope you don't suck at life the way you suck at math.
LA has a budget bigger than 10 states including many of your red states. If that's poor, what do you call Mississippi?
And what is wrong with CA spending it's own money on it's own citizens? Are they stealing from some other state? Why don't you worry about your own shitholes with meth epidemics and falling living standards instead of concern trolling about world's fifth biggest economy.
Liberal Nirvana...
In other words, it is possible that any single city spending more money in homeless would even get further more inflow of homeless on top of the previous figure. (Perhaps a city without any spending/ budget for helping homeless then would naturally have much less homeless.)
Just wait till you see Venezuela.
One is a CFO and the other a IT Consultant worried about Calif Homeless problem while supposedly at work. True beauticians! Bro?