Why Are Tens Of Thousands of Homeless Still Sleeping on the Streets in LA despite spending Billions

Of course they don't, which is why the homeless population is four times more.

Instead of trying to scare people about BILLIONS, why don't you talk about per capita spending or even percentage spending of city's budget?

Are you trying to have a honest conversation or is 'CALIFORNIA BAD' is the agenda again? Show the numbers in context if you really give a shit about California's taxpayers who already have to subsidize not only their own citizens but red states as well.
Money well spent according to a stupid Lib...
 
in California, 1 in 5 are considered POOR...
that's 20%...
heard that percentage yet, Libby Libby?

But all is well, unless, of course, you live outside La Jolla, Brentwood, or Mountain View...

Yes, according to California standards.

If they used red state metric, there won't be any poor at all.
 
Of course they don't, which is why the homeless population is four times more.

Instead of trying to scare people about BILLIONS, why don't you talk about per capita spending or even percentage spending of city's budget?

Are you trying to have a honest conversation or is 'CALIFORNIA BAD' is the agenda again? Show the numbers in context if you really give a shit about California's taxpayers who already have to subsidize not only their own citizens but red states as well.

Why don't we talk about the complete waste of tax payer money. As noted in the article "As much money as L.A. spends on homelessness, policymakers have no intention of providing enough homeless shelters to put a roof over homeless people’s heads."

It is a completely absurd, money-wasting program -- billions spent to not even provide a reasonable solution.

For the amount of money that has been spent on the program you could have rented each and every one of the 57,794 homeless in LA a starter condo -- or purchased them one if done via multi-unit acquisitions.
 
At least they have all their teeth.

Yep. My best friend growing up lived homeless in London when he was 17, it was temporary but he has always loathed large communal shelters.

Better to stay on the street if you can, there are decent places but always packed he said. He also had a pet rat, he says if a well fed rat won't eat dumped food, don't touch it yourself.

Useful tip. Maybe the rat would be a good party mascot for the Trumpers who want to spit from the rational members. They are loyal, not very bright but they know what they want etc?

upload_2018-1-19_11-25-12.png


or the other two.
 
Why don't we talk about the complete waste of tax payer money. As noted in the article "As much money as L.A. spends on homelessness, policymakers have no intention of providing enough homeless shelters to put a roof over homeless people’s heads."

It is a completely absurd, money-wasting program -- billions spent to not even provide a reasonable solution.

For the amount of money that has been spent on the program you could have rented each and every one of the 57,794 homeless in LA a starter condo -- or purchased them one if done via multi-unit acquisitions.

How much money have they spent? I didn't see any cumulative figures. Can you show me the math about your starter condo concept, surely if things were that simple, they would have been done already.
 
How much money have they spent? I didn't see any cumulative figures. Can you show me the math about your starter condo concept, surely if things were that simple, they would have been done already.

Which part of the story about liberal politicians blowing billions for their own purposes and not using it to fix the problem do you fail to understand.
 
How much money have they spent? I didn't see any cumulative figures. Can you show me the math about your starter condo concept, surely if things were that simple, they would have been done already.

He (GWB) is just reacting as usual without checking, speaking without concern. I imagine he is mid 40s.. but in 20 years he will be the ULTIMATE grumpy old GOP.
 
Back
Top