Quote from ByLoSellHi:
Trader, I know exactly what you're saying about the frustration of analysts' downgrades.
First, they often times seem to be based on some bare modicum of relevant data or are based on seemingly insignificant events.
Second, we all know that analysts more often get it wrong than right.
Third, the downgrades are often outright arbitrary, such as "the stock is approaching fair valuation based on our previous price target." Oh really?
Fourth, I suspect there are a lot of ulterior motives for downgrades. Paint me cynical, but I can literally imagine institutional firms calling in favors to have stocks 'downgraded' so as to force small block investors out of their positions and allow some hedge fund to consolidate its holdings.
I had a large position in Dow Chemical and began scaling out (foolishly) when Goldman Sachs 'downgraded' it when it was $36.50 last fall.
Quote from ByLoSellHi:
I just wanted to quote myself here.
This really pisses me off. I was in at 58, and out at just over 66, because of analysts downgrades (not because of the downgrades, but because of the price action because of the downgrades, where Valero fell to $64 last week).
Now, other analysts have upgraded the stock, on the same fundamental argument I had made prior (low P/E, nice ROE/ROI, great P/S ratio). And Valero bounces to over $67 today.
These analyst downgrades/upgrades are so much arbitrary horseshit, but the consequences for a trader can't be ignored.
Quote from Trader7793:
Seems like 74.68 was the high for this week, then it fell back some. Maybe next week. I think that I will hold on to the June 65 calls til next wednesday or so...see if I can get a little more out of them. Anyone else still holding the underlying?