Think the past winter was bad? Get ready for mini Ice Age

[Trader666]

But you are mistaken, the models did not fail. The temps are still well within the predicted ranges. Air temps never go in straight lines. Regardless, virtually the entire world's science community is an agreement about it.....still.

Are detachment from reality and dishonesty required of all liberals?

 

[Max E.]

Are detachment from reality and dishonesty required of all liberals?

Yes.

 

[futurecurrents]

Are detachment from reality and dishonesty required of all liberals?

Let me repeat. The models have certainly not failed. Your right wing propaganda sources say they have but really, they haven't. You are deluded.

Oh, and CO2 is still a greenhouse gas. Do you know what that is?

Would you like to see some facts? Would they mean anything to you?

 

[futurecurrents]

Here you go 666. Something other than your right wing propaganda/disinformation. I don't expect you will look at it objectively.

Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...t/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate

 

[gwb-trading]

Here you go 666. Something other than your right wing propaganda/disinformation. I don't expect you will look at it objectively.

Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...t/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate

The funny part of this article is how the Guardian administrators remove any comment that in the least bit doubts global warming as not abiding by their community standards - for example "The climate models missed the last 15 years temperature hiatus, how to explain that?" was removed.

The article is at a similar level - a pure bunch of bunk that does not address the facts put out by a bunch of alarmists who believe that anyone with dissenting opinions should not be heard.

 

[futurecurrents]

The funny part of this article is how the Guardian administrators remove any comment that in the least bit doubts global warming as not abiding by their community standards - for example "The climate models missed the last 15 years temperature hiatus, how to explain that?" was removed.

The article is at a similar level - a pure bunch of bunk that does not address the facts put out by a bunch of alarmists who believe that anyone with dissenting opinions should not be heard.

Sorry, as usual on this topic, you are wrong and delusional. The article and charts within it speaks for itself. It does it so well that you have to make up some shit about the comments. Pathetic.

 

[LEAPup]

That Canadian loud mouth got banned again. Brass I think was his last alias.
RCG got banned for dissing our wounded warriors then refusing to retract.
Before that though he started a $1 FX journal. Then got caught lying about his positions. It was hilarious.
Shortly thereafter IQ47 threw a tantrum over racism and asked to be "excused".

I'd call that a good house cleaning.

 

[gwb-trading]

Sorry, as usual on this topic, you are wrong and delusional. The article and charts within it speaks for itself. It does it so well that you have to make up some shit about the comments. Pathetic.

It's amazing that the unaltered charts from the IPCC show that all the models fail to track reality. When the Guardian alters the charts suddenly the assertion is that they do. A complete fantasy with no bearing on the observed reality.

 

[futurecurrents]

It's amazing that the unaltered charts from the IPCC show that all the models fail to track reality. When the Guardian alters the charts suddenly the assertion is that they do. A complete fantasy with no bearing on the observed reality.

No, you are wrong. Get over it and move on.

 

[Trader666]

Here you go 666. Something other than your right wing propaganda/disinformation. I don't expect you will look at it objectively.

Global warming predictions prove accurate
Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...t/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate

An "article" in The Guardian?

How about a scientific assessment? What part of this do you disagree with?
www.nipccreport.org/reports/ccr2a/pdf/Chapter-1-Models.pdf