Think the past winter was bad? Get ready for mini Ice Age

Trader666 said:
Wow. What a bag of douche. From that and what I've seen from skimming P&R, the boy's got issues.

Anything else I missed?
More...
That Canadian loud mouth got banned again. Brass I think was his last alias.
RCG got banned for dissing our wounded warriors then refusing to retract.
Before that though he started a $1 FX journal. Then got caught lying about his positions. It was hilarious.
Shortly thereafter IQ47 threw a tantrum over racism and asked to be "excused".
 
Trader666 said:
You'd do well to take your own advice of getting your facts straight, useful idiot. The "science" behind climate change is so crude and politicized that it might even be worse than useless. How? By potentially prompting a massive, misguided over-reaction to natural forces beyond our control that does more economic harm than environmental good. BTW nobody has a clue when the next ice age will occur. You're such an ignorant, rabid idealogue that you don't even know what you don't know.
More...


You do realize that AGW is a fact right? That the warming is certainly NOT natural? That we can pay a little now or a lot more later?

And that yes, "somebody has a clue" about when the next ice age may occur.

300px-Ice_Age_Temperature.png


So, aside from being totally wrong, you're right. Good to see somethings never change. LOL
 
Lucrum said:
That Canadian loud mouth got banned again. Brass I think was his last alias.
RCG got banned for dissing our wounded warriors then refusing to retract.
Before that though he started a $1 FX journal. Then got caught lying about his positions. It was hilarious.
Shortly thereafter IQ47 threw a tantrum over racism and asked to be "excused".
More...
Awesome! Thank you.
 
Trader666 said:
Says the so-called climatologists whose models and predictions have failed so spectacularly?


You wrote: "The next ice age is not due for fifty thousand years" and I was referring to this possibility:
http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2004/05mar_arctic/
More...

But you are mistaken, the models did not fail. The temps are still well within the predicted ranges. Air temps never go in straight lines. Regardless, virtually the entire world's science community is an agreement about it.....still.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top