If a model does not fit the observed reality, then it is wrong. Any simpleton should be able to figure that out. If you want to argue that man is responsible for global warming, then go ahead, but at least be honest about the data you are using. Not one single climate model was right in its predictions. And we're not talking small errors here, the models were flat out wrong. Hell, even the AGW nutters have accepted that. That's why they are scrambling to explain it. Re; "the heat sank into the ocean, blah, blah, blah"
Arnie. You're right wing propaganda sources say the models have failed. They have not.
Arnie, do you trade? Have you ever seen a stock price trend go in a smooth straight line? Of course not. The trend is defined by deviations around the mean. Climate models predict trend only. They are not meant to predict short term fluctuations. They are simply not sophisticated enough yet. That's why they always use probability bands. Note that your chart has no probability bands. The reason for that is that is intentional deception on the part of the propagandist that distributed that chart.
