St. Louis Riots Follow Common Script

In this country, we don't shoot people for stealing a few cigars.

Yet.
The big question is, did the cop know the details of the robbery? The call goes out that a store was robbed and here's the description of the suspect. OK, Brown matches the description and the cop goes into action. Does he know what was stolen was a box of cheap cigars by an unarmed man in what amounts to shoplifting, or does he just have a report that a store was robbed? Makes a hell of a difference in how you handle the situation, or at least it should.
 
Latest news conference Chief Barney Fife just told us that the cop in question did not know that Brown was a robbery suspect. So we have a couple guys walking down the street. Officer "I got to shoot someone" tells them to get out of the road and on to the street. Basically it's a jaywalking incident. This somehow escalates to a struggle and the kill crazy cop pulling his gun. The kid runs, gets hit, turns to surrender and Mr. I'm going to kill you anyway keeps blasting.
Overstated? Not by much, and damn sure not by much to the black community. Seems like this cop did not handle this situation well. Not well at all.
 
In this country, we don't shoot people for stealing a few cigars.

Yet.


Why do you post this nonsense?

No one is claiming he should be shot for stealing cigars. The fact that he and his buddy had committed a violent crime is highly relevant to a number of issues though, such as why he wouldn't want to be detained and the credibilty of his buddy's account of the incident.

I'd love to see you try to arrest a 6'4" 300 pound guy and his accomplice when they are attacking you and trying to get your weapon. Plenty of cops resort to force too quickly, but they aren't legally required to duke it out with two guys to effect an arrest. They can pull their gun and if threatened, use them. What they can't do is shoot a fleeing suspect.
 
Why do you post this nonsense?

No one is claiming he should be shot for stealing cigars. The fact that he and his buddy had committed a violent crime is highly relevant to a number of issues though, such as why he wouldn't want to be detained and the credibilty of his buddy's account of the incident.

I'd love to see you try to arrest a 6'4" 300 pound guy and his accomplice when they are attacking you and trying to get your weapon. Plenty of cops resort to force too quickly, but they aren't legally required to duke it out with two guys to effect an arrest. They can pull their gun and if threatened, use them. What they can't do is shoot a fleeing suspect.

Since the officer's account of events gets more elaborate over time, we'll have to wait until the final draft before drawing any conclusions.

Even so, a review of the law regarding killing someone for resisting arrest would seem to be in order.
 
Since the officer's account of events gets more elaborate over time, we'll have to wait until the final draft before drawing any conclusions.

Even so, a review of the law regarding killing someone for resisting arrest would seem to be in order.


I'm not aware of the officer's account becoming more elaborate. In fact, i haven't seen an official account at all.

None of us knows what happened. It's unfortunate that it has become so politicized, as that interferes with normal analysis. As I said before, conservatives are becoming alarmed by police militarization and overuse of force. At the same time, we are so tired of seeing race hustlers with their phony outrage and shopworn demands. They are not outraged, they are delighted to see incidents like this in the same way vultures are delighted to see a cow dying in the desert.

Liberals, the media and the black apologists got way too far out over their skis on this. Now they are angry that the police sucker-punched them with the C store video. Like the angelic Travon, this guy was at least a minor thug. That doesn't give the police a license to shoot him though.

We all need to push the reset button and wait for actual facts.
 
On Saturday a Ferguson, Missouri, police officer shot and killed Michael Brown, an unarmed teenager on his way to college this week. Brown was shot multiple times, though his hands were in the air. His uncovered body was left in the street for hours, as a crowd from his neighborhood gathered to stand vigil. Then they marched down to the police station. On Sunday evening, some folks in the crowd looted a couple of stores and threw bottles at the police. Monday morning was marked by peaceful protests.

The people of Ferguson are angry. Outraged. The officer’s story is dubious. Any black kid with sense knows it is futile to reach into an officer’s vehicle and take his gun. That story is only plausible to people who believe that black people are animals, that black men go looking for cops to pick fights with. Absurdity. Eyewitness accounts like these make far more sense.

It seems far easier to focus on the few looters who have reacted unproductively to this tragedy than to focus on the killing of Michael Brown. Perhaps looting seems like a thing we can control. I refuse. I refuse to condemn the folks engaged in these acts, because I respect black rage. I respect black people’s right to cry out, shout and be mad as hell that another one of our kids is dead at the hands of the police. Moreover I refuse the lie that the opportunism of a few in any way justifies or excuses the murderous opportunism undertaken by this as yet anonymous officer.

The police mantra is “to serve and to protect.” But with black folks, we know that’s not the mantra. The mantra for many, many officers when dealing with black people is apparently “kill or be killed.”

It is that deep irrational fear of young black men that continues to sit with me. Here’s the thing: I do not believe that most white people see black people and say, “I hate black people.” Racism is not that tangible, that explicit. I do not believe most white people hate most black people. I do not believe that most police officers seek to do harm or consciously hate black people. At least I hope they don’t.

I believe that racism exists in the inexplicable sense of fear, unsafety and gnawing anxiety that white people, be they officers with guns or just general folks moving about their lives, have when they encounter black people. I believe racism exists in that sense of mistrust, the extra precautions white people take when they encounter black people. I believe all these emotions have emerged from a lifetime of media consumption subtly communicating that black people are criminal, a lifetime of seeing most people in power look just like you, a lifetime of being the majority population. And I believe this subconscious sense of having lost control (of the universe) exists for white people, at a heightened level since the election of Barack Obama and the continued explosion of the non-white population.

The irony is that black people understand this heightened anxiety. We feel it, too. We study white people. We are taught this as a tool of survival. We know when there is unrest in the souls of white folks. We know that unrest, if not assuaged quickly, will lead to black death. Our suspicions, unlike those of white people, are proven right time and time again.

I speak to this deep psychology of race, not because I am trying to engage in pop psychology but because we live in a country that is so deeply emotionally dishonest about both race and racism. When will we be honest enough to acknowledge that the police have more power than the ordinary citizen? They are supposed to. And with more power comes more responsibility.

Why are police calling the people of Ferguson animals and yelling at them to “bring it”? Because those officers in their riot gear, with their tear gas and dogs, want a justification for slaughter. But inexplicably in that moment we turn our attention to the rioters, the people with less power, but justifiable anger, and say, “You are the problem.” No. A cop killing an unarmed teenager who had his hands in the air is the problem. Anger is a perfectly reasonable response. So is rage.

We are talking about justifiable outrage. Outrage over the unjust taking of the lives of people who look like us. How dare people preach and condescend to these people and tell them not to loot, not to riot? Yes, those are destructive forms of anger, but frankly I would rather these people take their anger out on property and products rather than on other people.

No, I don’t support looting. But I question a society that always sees the product of the provocation and never the provocation itself. I question a society that values property over black life. But I know that our particular system of law was conceived on the founding premise that black lives are white property. “Possession,” the old adage goes, “is nine-tenths of the law.”

But we are the dispossessed. We cannot count on the law to protect us. We cannot count on police not to shoot us down in cold blood. We cannot count on politics to be a productive outlet for our rage. We cannot count on prayer to soothe our raging, ragged souls.

This is what I mean when I say that we live in a society that is deeply emotionally dishonest about racism. We hear a story each and every week now about how some overzealous officer has killed another black man, or punched or beaten or choked a black woman. This week we heard two stories – Mike Brown in Missouri and John Crawford in Ohio. These are not isolatedincidents. How many cops in how many cities have to murder how many black men — assault how many black women — before we recognize that this shit is not isolated? It is systemic from the top to the bottom.

Every week we are having what my friend Dr. Regina Bradley called #anotherhashtagmemorial.Every week. We are weak. We are tired. Of being punching bags and shooting targets for the police. We are tired of well-meaning white citizens and respectable black ones foreclosing all outlets for rage. We are tired of these people telling us what isn’t the answer.

The answer isn’t looting, no. The answer isn’t rioting, no. But the answer also isn’t preaching to black people about “black-on-black” crime without full acknowledgment that most crime is intraracial. The answer is not having a higher standard for the people than for the police. The answer is not demanding that black people get mad about and solve the problem of crime in Chicago before we get mad about the slaughter of a teen boy just outside St. Louis.

We can be, and have been, and are mad about both. Violence is the effect, not the cause of the concentrated poverty that locks that many poor people up together with no conceivable way out and no productive way to channel their rage at having an existence that is adjacent to the American dream. This kind of social mendacity about the way that racism traumatizes black people individually and collectively is a festering sore, an undiagnosed cancer, a raging infection threatening to overtake every organ in our body politic.

We are tired of these people preaching a one-sided gospel of peace. “Turn the other cheek” now means “here are our collective asses to kiss.” We are tired of forgiving people because they most assuredly do know what they do.

Mike Brown is dead. He is dead for no reason. He is dead because a police officer saw a 6-foot-4, 300-plus-pound black kid, and miscalculated the level of threat. To be black in this country is to be subject to routine forms of miscalculated risk each and every day. Black people have every right to be angry as hell about being mistaken for predators when really we are prey. The idea that we would show no rage as we accrete body upon body – Eric Garner, John Crawford, Mike Brown (and those are just our summer season casualties) — is the height of delusion. It betrays a stunning lack of empathy, a stunning refusal of people to grant the fact of black humanity, and in granting our humanity, granting us the right to the full range of emotions that come with being human. Rage must be expressed. If not it will tear you up from the inside out or make you tear other people up. Usually the targets are those in closest proximity. The disproportionate amount of heart disease, cancers, hypertension, obesity, violence and other maladies that plague black people is as much a product of internalized, unrecognized, unaddressed rage as it is anything else. more . . .
 
Back
Top