Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit ‘Irrational’ – ‘Based On Nonsense’ –

[CaptainObvious]

Nuclear is the answer and has been for decades. But why solve the problem when we can have endless campaigns about all the shit that doesn't work?

 

[gwb-trading]

Nuclear is the answer and has been for decades. But why solve the problem when we can have endless campaigns about all the shit that doesn't work?

The Climate Cabal wants to jail all the "deniers" who promote nuclear.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Here is the most glaring one.

DONALD TRUMP: "Our country is out of control. People are pouring through the southern border."

THE FACTS: Arrest statistics are widely regarded as the best measure, if an imperfect one, of the flow of people crossing illegally into the U.S. And Trump's suggestion that illegal immigration is increasing at the border is not supported by arrest statistics discussed in recent months by Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson.

Where did Trump say that illegal immigration was increasing. There are several others.

What does "out of control" suggest? Illegal immigration and a "fantastic wall with a beautiful door" was his opening salvo when he announced that he was running. You think he went with that because he thought the problem was decreasing?

 

[wildchild]

What does "out of control" suggest? Illegal immigration and a "fantastic wall with a beautiful door" was his opening salvo when he announced that he was running. You think he went with that because he thought the problem was decreasing?

I think he went with that because he thought there was problem, which there is.

 

[CaptainObvious]

The Climate Cabal wants to jail all the "deniers" who promote nuclear.

No surprise. The "camps" are a favorite tool of the left to silence the opposition. Anyone wants to know what the ultimate leftist utopia looks like? North Korea. Speak out of line, hell, even look out of line and it's off to the "get your mind right" camp, or worse. Dear Leader is the only god allowed and his government dictates everything.
Silence you heathens, the left knows better than you.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Speak out of line, hell, even look out of line and it's off to the "get your mind right" camp, or worse.

Is that something like a "purity test?"

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/11/24/some-conservatives-push-a-purity-test-for-gop-candidates/

 

[smallStops]

Is that something like a "purity test?"

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/11/24/some-conservatives-push-a-purity-test-for-gop-candidates/

Lol
Nowadays, everybody is so scarred of scammers that even the Republicans want to
make sure that candidates who might pose as republicans, but do not hold conservative values are wiped out from the starting line.

 

[CaptainObvious]

Is that something like a "purity test?"

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/11/24/some-conservatives-push-a-purity-test-for-gop-candidates/

That's exactly what it is. However I don't think they're calling for imprisonment for those that fail to measure up, at lest not yet. I never said the extreme right is exempt from this stupidity, but they're a little behind the left. Give'em time, they'll catch up.

 

[futurecurrents]

You notice none of this was in the mainstream media. I wonder why.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11...sed-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: 'Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.' - 'When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period.'

Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: 'Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. We are being led down a false path. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?'

Over a period of several months, two Greenpeace employees posed as representatives of energy companies and offered to pay prominent commentators on climate change to write papers that extolled the benefits of coal and carbon emissions. The Greenpeace workers also asked that the payments not be disclosed.

William Happer, a professor of physics at Princeton, agreed to write a paper at the request of an unnamed oil and gas company in the Middle East.

Dr. Happer wrote in his exchanges with Greenpeace that he believed there were “real pollutants associated with the combustion of fossil fuels,” including the oxides of nitrogen and sulfur that contribute to smog, and that he supported regulation of those pollutants.

But he opposed the notion that carbon dioxide itself is a pollutant.

“More CO2 will benefit the world,” he wrote.



http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/science/greenpeace-subterfuge-tests-climate-research.html

 

[wildchild]

Over a period of several months, two Greenpeace employees posed as representatives of energy companies and offered to pay prominent commentators on climate change to write papers that extolled the benefits of coal and carbon emissions. The Greenpeace workers also asked that the payments not be disclosed.

William Happer, a professor of physics at Princeton, agreed to write a paper at the request of an unnamed oil and gas company in the Middle East.

Dr. Happer wrote in his exchanges with Greenpeace that he believed there were “real pollutants associated with the combustion of fossil fuels,” including the oxides of nitrogen and sulfur that contribute to smog, and that he supported regulation of those pollutants.

But he opposed the notion that carbon dioxide itself is a pollutant.

“More CO2 will benefit the world,” he wrote.



http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/science/greenpeace-subterfuge-tests-climate-research.html

CO2 is not a pollutant.