Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit ‘Irrational’ – ‘Based On Nonsense’ –

Breibart?

Not reading.


You are a sheep.

Yes, we know you have reading comprehension issues...
and refuse to read anything that may conflict with your own preconceived opinions.

Enjoy your life with your head stuck in the ground.

2942358-5724318977-bury-.jpg
 
So are we to believe that you actually refer to Breitbart for scientific truth?

Hell, I'll read something from Fox before wasting my time on that crap.
I think I now understand where your problem lies.


Yes, we know you have reading comprehension issues...
and refuse to read anything that may conflict with your own preconceived opinions.

Enjoy your life with your head stuck in the ground.

2942358-5724318977-bury-.jpg
 
Yes it came from the atmosphere some 300 million years ago over the course of millions of years. Now we are releasing it within a few hundred. It is "new" CO2 to our current atmosphere.

So we have good CO2 and we have bad CO2. We have a bunch of predictions that turned out to be false. We have alarmists falsifying data. We have socialist around the world using this pseudo-science to destroy economic activity. When does it end?
 
So we have good CO2 and we have bad CO2. We have a bunch of predictions that turned out to be false. We have alarmists falsifying data. We have socialist around the world using this pseudo-science to destroy economic activity. When does it end?


Every sentence that you wrote is wrong. Except for the last one, which is a very poignant one.

Congratulations.

lol
 
So are we to believe that you actually refer to Breitbart for scientific truth?

Hell, I'll read something from Fox before wasting my time on that crap.
I think I now understand where your problem lies.

Actually you should go to the scientific paper directly linked from Breitbart for the scientific truth. It is is full of facts, figures and statistics for your in-depth review.
 
Actually you should go to the scientific paper directly linked from Breitbart for the scientific truth. It is is full of facts, figures and statistics for your in-depth review.

Futurecurrents prefers to get his facts from Science for Kids.
 
Actually you should go to the scientific paper directly linked from Breitbart for the scientific truth. It is is full of facts, figures and statistics for your in-depth review.


Well then actually you should just post the paper for us to read rather than an obviously biased and unreliable source.

But you are not interested in the actual truth.
 
Back
Top