Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit ‘Irrational’ – ‘Based On Nonsense’ –

[wildchild]

You notice none of this was in the mainstream media. I wonder why.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11...sed-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: 'Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.' - 'When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period.'

Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: 'Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. We are being led down a false path. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?'

Greenpeace Co-Founder Dr. Patrick Moore: 'We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science.'

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...n/06/climate-change-climate-change-scepticism

 

[wildchild]

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...n/06/climate-change-climate-change-scepticism

Richard Lindzen is the only guy who has been correct. The climate models of every single alarmist have been proven to be complete bullshit.

 

[ipatent]

When the government wants something, the laws of physics don't get in the way any more than the Constitution does.

 

[Ricter]

You notice none of this was in the mainstream media. I wonder why.

Because it's a vast conspiracy.

Out to get ya.

 

[wildchild]

Because it's a vast conspiracy.

Out to get ya.

A guy who is Hot for Hillary is talking about conspiracies. How rich is that? Go crawl back in your hole.

 

[Ricter]

A guy who is Hot for Hillary is talking about conspiracies. How rich is that? Go crawl back in your hole.

I told you I'm psyched for Sanders now, rimlikker.

 

[wildchild]

I told you I'm psyched for Sanders now, rimlikker.

Didn't Sanders just today get accused of accessing Hillary's data? Classy move. I guess he figured that since the Chinese and Russians already did it, he was liberty to do it himself.

 

[Ricter]

Didn't Sanders just today get accused of accessing Hillary's data? Classy move. I guess he figured that since the Chinese and Russians already did it, he was liberty to do it himself.

You're a full crock.

 

[gwb-trading]

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...n/06/climate-change-climate-change-scepticism

So what you are saying is that the Heads of the Climate Departments at 5 of the top 10 U.S. scientific universities do not support AGW theory.

Of course this political environment, the Guardian and other leftie publications simply print articles attempting to undermine their voices.