NRA Hijinks

Yesterday, besides the two journalists who were shot and killed while doing their jobs in Virginia, four people were shot and wounded in a home invasion in Minneapolis, MN (link). Two people were shot and killed and eight others, including a 14-year-old female, were shot and wounded in separate shootings from Wednesday morning through last night in Chicago (link). Two people were shot and wounded in Houston, TX last night (link). A 17-year-old male was shot and killed last night in Houston, TX (link). One person was shot and killed in Indianapolis, IN last night (link). One person was shot and killed and another person was shot and wounded in Detroit, MI this morning (link). Three people were shot and wounded in Rankin, PA last night (link). Two people were shot and killed in West Palm Beach, FL yesterday afternoon (link).

bilde

So how would you get rid of the guns?
 
Two people were shot and killed in a drive-by shooting yesterday in DeKalb County, GA (link). One person was shot and killed in Macon, GA last night (link). A police officer was shot and killed yesterday in Fox Lake, IL (link). A two-year-old boy was shot and killed yesterday in Pittsburgh, PA (link). One person was shot and killed and two others were shot and wounded in St Louis, MO yesterday (link). Two teenagers were shot and wounded in a drive-by shooting in Cleveland yesterday (link). On Sunday night, one man shot and killed his brother and then shot and killed himself near Opelousas, LA (link).
 
Isn't that the superhero you turn into the moment you feel you've been (OMG!) snarked?

Nah, that's when I turn into the guy who stomps the shit out of you. Do you have a solution for getting the guns out of circulation? I'd love to hear it, even though you really have no say in anything in the US.
 
Nah, that's when I turn into the guy who stomps the shit out of you. Do you have a solution for getting the guns out of circulation? I'd love to hear it, even though you really have no say in anything in the US.
Yes, amend the Second Amendment. Each long journey begins with the first step. Since the Amendment is so widely open to interpretation, it should be much more clearly and intelligently defined. The first step won't get you there. But without a first step, you go nowhere; you remain in place.

Oh, and you want impotent rage? Here's some:

upload_2015-9-3_10-10-18.jpeg
 
Years ago I mentioned on this board that if everyone was (or at least assumed to be) armed, criminals would simply "get the drop on ya" and/or shoot first. And that's what we're seeing now.

More guns!
 
Yes, amend the Second Amendment. Each long journey begins with the first step. Since the Amendment is so widely open to interpretation, it should be much more clearly and intelligently defined. The first step won't get you there. But without a first step, you go nowhere; you remain in place.

Oh, and you want impotent rage? Here's some:

View attachment 156469

That picture isn't me, though.

So let's hear your plan to get rid of the guns. Amend the Second Amendment to what? After you change the amendment, how do you get the guns off the street?

Let's walk through it and see if your plan has merit.
 
Yes, amend the Second Amendment. Each long journey begins with the first step. Since the Amendment is so widely open to interpretation, it should be much more clearly and intelligently defined. The first step won't get you there. But without a first step, you go nowhere; you remain in place.

Oh, and you want impotent rage? Here's some:

View attachment 156469
"open to interpretation";". No, it just doesn't say what you want it to say.
 
Years ago I mentioned on this board that if everyone was (or at least assumed to be) armed, criminals would simply "get the drop on ya" and/or shoot first.

Since the majority of conflicts are not premeditated, this is simply untrue.
 
Back
Top