It’s hard to understate how poor Trump’s Iran policy is going

Sorry but it’s not so cut and dry. We are certainly policing in Iraq and a counterforce to Iran there. Out removal allows Iran to move unfettered.

The way you thought is wrong because the information you consume is biased. I know it’s like a plot twist in a movie but you’re actually the one consuming fake news.

But the trump administration finds itself in this position often. Not too long ago the State Department was demanding Iran CONTINUE to stay in compliance with its nuclear agreement after Trump pulled us out on false pretenses.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/...still-comply-with-nuke-deal-that-trump-exited

The point I made was that Trump has not committed to long term nation building but is requiring good behavior - such as not killing americans and theatening us- from other countries.

If the countries that are currently involved in recent attempts by America to nationbuilding- such as Iraq- want to help themselves and work with us then that door is open but if they get difficult- I will say for the fourth time- he is not committed to them. He might work with things that are working, but is not committed to them if they are confrontational with us. The fact that that puts them in the Iranian camp which they are already in, is not a show stopper.

Ditto for Afghanistan. Trump knows that our discontinuing nationbuilding with them means a Taliban takeover, especially since the Taliban already run the place. But that does not change his policy or view.

Good behavior is required by both Iraq and Iran. Bad behavior by Iraq toward us and we are gone. Bad behavior by Iran and well......one of us will be gone.
 
The point I made was that Trump has not committed to long term nation building but is requiring good behavior - such as not killing americans and theatening us- from other countries.

If the countries that are currently involved in recent attempts by America to nationbuilding- such as Iraq- want to help themselves and work with us then that door is open but if they get difficult- I will say for the fourth time- he is not committed to them. He might work with things that are working, but is not committed to them if they are confrontational with us. The fact that that puts them in the Iranian camp which they are already in, is not a show stopper.

Ditto for Afghanistan. Trump knows that our discontinuing nationbuilding with them means a Taliban takeover, especially since the Taliban already run the place. But that does not change his policy or view.

Good behavior is required by both Iraq and Iran. Bad behavior by Iraq toward us and we are gone. Bad behavior by Iran and well......one of us will be gone.

Alright, your position is give Iraq to Iran and bomb them as needed.

I don’t think you understand how dangerous this would actually be.
 
That's actually 1st grade politics: I don't want Donald to play with my blocks; Donald won't stop playing with my blocks. Donald, why did you hit Bobby, that's not nice. Bobby knocked my blocks down. Those are Bobby's blocks. Your blocks are over there. I don't want those blocks, I want these blocks. Bobby won't play fair. I hate Bobby. (tweet - tweet - tweet - tweet....)
Not quite. People's lives aren't lost on a first grade playground. Its not even fucking close.
Whatever.
 
You seem to have nothing but good news for the Ayatollah everytime you post. Why don't you send him a little email with your conclusions. Last time I saw him, he was crying his sorry arse off.

And as far as the galavaniing bit, those fuckers chant Death to America six days a week for decades regardless of what the fuck is going on so those big crowds mean shiite the following week. There is an entire generation of Iranians who are interested in a more western-friendly life and want to see an improved economy while all this endless jihad shit is going on. And yes, it tweaks their national pride to see a foreign country knock off someone they - the protester generation- hate but they also know it advances their cause. Either way, they are not going to live in bleakness for the jihad shit forever, and accept deals where Iran gets 150 billion and all of it goes to terrorist shit and nuclear development. You think things are looking rosy for the Ayatollah? You just stay with that then. You and your man Joe Biden are moving wayyyy behind the times.
Don’t forget that UsualPenis told us many times that we were ‘on the road to Iran’.
Obviously he meant that we were BECOMING IRAN, which of course is so insanely stupid that no thinking person with an IQ above ‘dull’ could conclude that seriously.
But maybe when he said we were ‘on the road’ there he meant that we were going to BBQ their murderous leaders?
Nah...he’s not prescient at all. At all. At all.
 
Don’t forget that UsualPenis told us many times that we were ‘on the road to Iran’.
Obviously he meant that we were BECOMING IRAN, which of course is so insanely stupid that no thinking person with an IQ above ‘dull’ could conclude that seriously.
But maybe when he said we were ‘on the road’ there he meant that we were going to BBQ their murderous leaders?
Nah...he’s not prescient at all. At all. At all.

usualpenis, here4penis......come on out already, Out4penis
 
You are getting repetitive now. Never good.

No one here other than the tard obama bootlickers has ever thought for one second that Iran stopped development on their nuclear program- so there is zero concern to worry about it re-starting.

And if talking up their nuke program by threatening to attack the U.S with it continues, well then, they are not going to have a nuke program. As I said, Trump will not allow bad behavior from them. And the Iran already owns and runs Iraq so ditto in regard to that. How the frig can you "hand them Iraq" when their own puppets run it. Iraq is responsible for being a sovereign government and they seem to choosing to hand themselves over to Iran. If you argue that they are not sovereign, that they are just puppets of Iran- well then, that makes my point. Thank you.
What about the Iraqis who do not want to become Iranian?
 
That's actually 1st grade politics: I don't want Donald to play with my blocks; Donald won't stop playing with my blocks. Donald, why did you hit Bobby, that's not nice. Bobby knocked my blocks down. Those are Bobby's blocks. Your blocks are over there. I don't want those blocks, I want these blocks. Bobby won't play fair. I hate Bobby. (tweet - tweet - tweet - tweet....)
Same goes for the other side?
 




https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/17/politics/trump-iran-complying-nuclear/index.html

Trump administration: Iran complying with nuclear deal
By Jeremy Diamond, CNN
Updated 2:20 AM EDT, Tue July 18, 2017


(CNN)The United States said Monday that Iran is continuing to comply with the terms of the nuclear deal that curbed Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.







Trump administration says Iran complying with nuclear deal


MATTHEW LEE
Associated PressApril 18, 2017

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration has notified Congress that Iran is complying with the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by former President Barack Obama, and says the U.S. has extended the sanctions relief given to the Islamic republic in exchange for curbs on its atomic program.

However, in a letter sent late Tuesday to House Speaker Paul Ryan, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the administration has undertaken a full review of the agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

"Iran remains a leading state sponsor of terror, through many platforms and methods," Tillerson wrote. He said the National Security Council-led interagency review of the agreement will evaluate whether it "is vital to the national security interests of the United States."

The certification of Iran's compliance, which must be sent to Congress every 90 days, is the first issued by the Trump administration. The deadline for this certification was midnight.

As a candidate in the 2016 presidential election, Trump was an outspoken critic of the deal but had offered conflicting opinions on whether he would try to scrap it, modify it or keep it in place with more strenuous enforcement. Tuesday's determination suggested that while Trump agreed with findings by the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that Iran is keeping to its end of the bargain, he is looking for another way to ratchet up pressure on Tehran.

Despite the sanctions relief, Iran remains on the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism for its support of anti-Israel groups and is still subject to non-nuclear sanctions, including for human rights abuses and for its backing of Syrian President Bashar Assad's government.

The nuclear deal was sealed in Vienna in July 2015 after 18 months of negotiations led by former Secretary of State John Kerry and diplomats from the other four permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — Britain, China, France and Russia — and Germany. Under its terms, Iran agreed to curb its nuclear program, long suspected of being aimed at developing atomic weapons, in return for billions of dollars in sanctions relief.

Opponents of the deal, including Israel, objected, saying it only delayed Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons and did not allow for the kind of inspections of its atomic sites that would guarantee it was not cheating. Obama, Kerry and others who negotiated the deal strenuously defended its terms and said the agreement made Israel, the Middle East and the world a safer place.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top