High Ranking US official caught on tape discussing Presidential election with Russians

[destriero]

Can you read?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa.../is-accepting-a-pardon-an-admission-of-guilt/

Can you? The most recent precedent in Burdick. You're quoting commentary from fucking 1833. lol.

 

[Good1]

Your mom.

Did you realize Stark is in over his head on this and come running to help with personal attacks?

 

[destriero]

Did you realize Stark is in over his head on this and come running to help with personal attacks?

Your pussy can only get so wet. Calm yourself and stop quoting sources from 1833.

 

[Good1]

Can you? The most recent precedent in Burdick. You're quoting commentary from fucking 1833. lol.

You are ignoring the fact that some people are convicted entirely unjustly, and not just partly, because the justice system itself is not wholly clean hands.

So you're saying Arapaio is guilty of contempt of court?

And the court was wholly justified?

And this affects the credibility of his investigator's investigations regarding the both certificate?

 

[Good1]

Your pussy can only get so wet. Calm yourself and stop quoting sources from 1833.

I didn't quote anything. I linked to an article. You seem a little touchy about an opinion from 1833. What about that opinion does not apply to Arapaio?

 

[destriero]

You are ignoring the fact that some people are convicted entirely unjustly, and not just partly, because the justice system itself is not wholly clean hands.

So you're saying Arapaio is guilty of contempt of court?

And the court was wholly justified?

And this affects the credibility of his investigator's investigations regarding the both certificate?

I'm stating that you ignore Federal precedent (Burdick) in favor of some printed (non-judicial) commentary from 1833.

Also, you're a unquestionably stupid fuck.

 

[Good1]

I'm stating that you ignore Federal precedent (Burdick) in favor of some printed (non-judicial) commentary from 1833.

Also, you're a unquestionably stupid fuck.

I'm not relying on that opinion. I'm relying on common sense which says that not all persons convicted by the judicial system are are guilty, because the judicial system does not have perfectly clean hands.

You disagree?

 

[Tony Stark]

Did Hawaii vouch for the "certificate" that was finally presented officially? In other words, does it contradict the findings of Arpaios investigators?

Yes

 

[destriero]

I'm not relying on that opinion. I'm relying on common sense which says that not all persons convicted by the judicial system are are guilty, because the judicial system does not have perfectly clean hands.

You disagree?

Your absurd fallacy. No different than to assert that all Pardoned are innocent.

 

[Good1]

Yes

Oh, ok. So you don't have any sources to back that up. Will you now hold me in contempt of Tony, the biggest birther ever?