Wait, so you're saying there are multiple parties involved in the fraudulent presentation of the "certificate"?
Still stands, after the chain of presentation, the document was proven to be fraudulent.
One can speculate on the chain of custody or circumstances, to what degree politicos were willing to dirty their hands, but the fraudulent nature of the document presented remains the most factual fact anyone can know about this whole fiasco.
Since it's presentation, and since Joe's subsequent proofs, who, from Hawaii, has presented any serious rebuttal, or any rebuttal at all?