the problem for trolls is this thing called search.
when you use it... you see I used the term in 2011 and you first used it in 2012.
when you use it... you see I used the term in 2011 and you first used it in 2012.
Everything Conservatives Said About the Paris Climate Agreement Is Already Wrong
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Anybody not agreeing with the right wing version of science which is directly contradicted by NASA, Pentagon, Scientists and Scientific bodies is a TROLL.
The real scientists are the Seth Rich conspiracy theorists waiting on KIM DOTCOM and PAMELA HANDJOB for the real peer reviewed science.
The real scientists are the Seth Rich conspiracy theorists waiting on KIM DOTCOM and PAMELA HANDJOB for the real peer reviewed science.
ExGOPer,
Ever heard the saying... "when you're in a hole, stop digging"?
Even the AGW nutters concede that CO2 lags temps. That means you see a increase in CO2 AFTER temps go up, not the other way around.
Abstract
The analysis of air bubbles from ice cores has yielded a precise record of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, but the timing of changes in these gases with respect to temperature is not accurately known because of uncertainty in the gas age–ice age difference. We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation.
Ever heard the saying... "when you're in a hole, stop digging"?
Even the AGW nutters concede that CO2 lags temps. That means you see a increase in CO2 AFTER temps go up, not the other way around.
Abstract
The analysis of air bubbles from ice cores has yielded a precise record of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, but the timing of changes in these gases with respect to temperature is not accurately known because of uncertainty in the gas age–ice age difference. We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation.
Great, emails this to Trump's Pentagon and when they accept your argument, I will consider researching this cut and paste.
you prefer to remain ignorant of science so you can continue to lie about it.
got it.
by the way... every scientist I have ever read knows that co2 trails temps in the data.
its basic climate science
its why the scientists not the media... not the bodies that make up lies about it.
even your sides climate scientists speculate co2 amplifies warming and cooling I have not seen any lately claim it causes warming and cooling.
you need to educate yourself on the arguments.
I am more than willing to read any articles you have where real climate scientsits show us science stating man made co2 causes warming. When I real the articles they defer the UN commissions statements. They don't say it for themselves out of their on science. But... I can't say I read every article so maybe you can produce a few that do not rely on models.
got it.
by the way... every scientist I have ever read knows that co2 trails temps in the data.
its basic climate science
its why the scientists not the media... not the bodies that make up lies about it.
even your sides climate scientists speculate co2 amplifies warming and cooling I have not seen any lately claim it causes warming and cooling.
you need to educate yourself on the arguments.
I am more than willing to read any articles you have where real climate scientsits show us science stating man made co2 causes warming. When I real the articles they defer the UN commissions statements. They don't say it for themselves out of their on science. But... I can't say I read every article so maybe you can produce a few that do not rely on models.
You are the guy who were peddling conspiracy theories about Seth Rich and how Kim Dotcom had evidence while citing a Fox News story that was DELETED.
Pardon me all over the place if I don't take your word over the Pentagon, NASA, Trump's EPA, Scientists, Scientific institutions and researchers
look at that troll tactic. you are trying to change the subject... and you lie about it.
I stated Fox news said they had a federal law enforcement source.
I proved they did make that statement.
We were not commenting on whether it was true... but whether they made that statement.
I stated Fox news said they had a federal law enforcement source.
I proved they did make that statement.
We were not commenting on whether it was true... but whether they made that statement.
And I kept telling you that they were lying
Let me for the last time explain why. Your fox news story said that it is CORROBORATING Wheeler's account - who admitted at the time you were debating me that he made the whole thing up and yet Fox News stood by the story. If they can use fake FBI sources like Wheeler once, surely they would have had no problem using some other bogus source especially if it's anonymous. Also, the 'reporter' who wrote that story was all over twitter re-tweeting conspiracy bullshit which was further clue that the whole thing was made up.
And in the end I was proven RIGHT because they scrubbed the whole thing from their site.
I was right or not? In the same I am right about climate change, you will just take time to realize it (just like the Seth Rich story)
did fox news claim to have a federal law enforcement source?
yes... then I was correct.
no... then you were correct.
---
here is a quote of the article... proving I told the truth and you were wrong.
An FBI forensic report of Rich's computer -- generated within 96 hours after Rich's murder -- showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time, the federal source told Fox News.
“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.
(then the article says this is consistent with Wheeler...
then it says...)
The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.
yes... then I was correct.
no... then you were correct.
---
here is a quote of the article... proving I told the truth and you were wrong.
An FBI forensic report of Rich's computer -- generated within 96 hours after Rich's murder -- showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time, the federal source told Fox News.
“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.
(then the article says this is consistent with Wheeler...
then it says...)
The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.