Everything Conservatives Said About the Paris Climate Agreement Is Already Wrong

did fox news claim to have a federal law enforcement source?
yes... then I was correct.
no... then you were correct.

And? I kept telling you that it was fake, not that they weren't peddling that fake news.

And I was proven right in the end, next time if it's Fox News, you should assume it's fake news

Chew on that
 
And? I kept telling you that it was fake, not that they weren't peddling that fake news.

And I was proven right in the end, next time if it's Fox News, you should assume it's fake news

Chew on that
you may have said that but you also denied that fox news said it had a federal law enforcement source.
 
Last edited:
you may have said that but you also denied that fox news said it had a federal law enforcement source.

No, I said they are FAKE NEWS and they are making it up which was proven correct in the end.
 
why are you always lying? it was only a week or 2 ago. we have a search function. its like you trolls lie first and then cover... instead of just doing a search and telling the truth.

Jem said...
"fox news was also quoting a federal law enforcement source... who gave them very specific details. Why are you misrepresenting this story.

here is one the tips...

The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21."

exgopper said..

"No they are not - they are quoting Wheeler who says he is quoting Fox.

It's your echo chamber at work.

Secondly, there is no federal investigation, FBI has outright denied they are investigating Seth Rich case.

Fox News making stuff up again just like their sources who told Clinton getting indicted"



No, I said they are FAKE NEWS and they are making it up which was proven correct in the end.
 
why are you always lying? it was only a week or 2 ago. we have a search function. its like you trolls lie first and then cover... instead of just doing a search and telling the truth.

Jem said...
"fox news was also quoting a federal law enforcement source... who gave them very specific details. Why are you misrepresenting this story.

here is one the tips...

The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21."

exgopper said..

"No they are not - they are quoting Wheeler who says he is quoting Fox.

It's your echo chamber at work.

Secondly, there is no federal investigation, FBI has outright denied they are investigating Seth Rich case.

Fox News making stuff up again just like their sources who told Clinton getting indicted"


And? Just because you are confused doesn't make me a liar. I explained why there was no other federal investigator to say anything because there was no federal investigation.Wheeler was the source of this so called Federal Investigator which he made up - just because Fox News presented it in a way that there was ANOTHER source was to make idiots of people like you. I showed you transcript from Fox channel where he claimed to have FBI sources, it's pretty obvious he was feeding them bullshit.

And if you think I am wrong then why didn't keep that part of the story on their site?

"Rich’s family slammed the Fox report as false, and Wheeler, a former D.C. homicide detective,appeared to back away from it on Wednesday. He said in an interview that he could not confirm the identity of a federal investigator making such an assertion and that he had no direct knowledge of it."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...4d1f5a-3b14-11e7-a058-ddbb23c75d82_story.html
 
you don't seem to understand that even if fox was lying about their federal law enforcement sources you were still wrong for denying they said they had them.

So you need to cease acting like you won this argument.
fox may have lied but you were still wrong.

And? Just because you are confused doesn't make me a liar. I explained why there was no other federal investigator to say anything because there was no federal investigation.Wheeler was the source of this so called Federal Investigator which he made up - just because Fox News presented it in a way that there was ANOTHER source was to make idiots of people like you. I showed you transcript from Fox channel where he claimed to have FBI sources, it's pretty obvious he was feeding them bullshit.

And if you think I am wrong then why didn't keep that part of the story on their site?

"Rich’s family slammed the Fox report as false, and Wheeler, a former D.C. homicide detective,appeared to back away from it on Wednesday. He said in an interview that he could not confirm the identity of a federal investigator making such an assertion and that he had no direct knowledge of it."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...4d1f5a-3b14-11e7-a058-ddbb23c75d82_story.html
 
you don't seem to understand that even if fox was lying about their federal law enforcement sources you were still wrong for denying they said they had them.

So you need to cease acting like you won this argument.
fox may have lied but you were still wrong.

I explained why that Fox News 'FBI source' was fake because Wheeler on the previous day was talking about having a FBI source on TV which he denied the next day when asked by Buzzfeed

Considering Wheeler was their NAMED source in the article, it was very easy for Fox to pretend they have a second source when they didn't have jackshit - just like Wheeler. Call it the Wheeler BS routine. Pretend you have a source and then pretend you were just quoting the article who uses you as a source.
 
Back
Top