Everything Conservatives Said About the Paris Climate Agreement Is Already Wrong

When did the author make this claim in the first place? It's nice there is lot of material but how is it relevant when it doesn't rebut what the author wrote.

The author claimed "China promised its total emissions would peak by 2030 — an ambitious goal for a rapidly industrializing economy. It is running at least a decade ahead of that goal." This statement is patently false and easily disproven -- by just about every source available that studies Chinese CO2 emissions.
 
The author claimed "China promised its total emissions would peak by 2030 — an ambitious goal for a rapidly industrializing economy. It is running at least a decade ahead of that goal." This statement is patently false and easily disproven -- by just about every source available that studies Chinese CO2 emissions.

Then prove it wrong - your source brings up old data and projections, nothing to do with current data. What has IEA projections got to do with what China itself is doing?
 
China is banking on being allowed to emit their filthy muck into the atmosphere by the others. No sanctions. no tariffs etc. So Dump is going to make it even worse. What a philosopher ! Our last great hope - down the drain.

YUK to Dump may he swallow it all.
 
China is banking on being allowed to emit their filthy muck into the atmosphere by the others. No sanctions. no tariffs etc. So Dump is going to make it even worse. What a philosopher ! Our last great hope - down the drain.

YUK to Dump, may he swallow it all.
Makes me want to dump in his grotty tower !
 
Welcome to new math. Such a complete re-write of the reality with China and India that you question which universe the author lives in.
But, but, China has promised to try real hard to do better and we should take their word cause you know, they've been so trustworthy in the past. But, but the threat of global catastrophe imminent, and you American evildoers must finance the polluters thereby helping them to grow and pollute more. Errrr, the end is near but the worst polluters have 15 years to clean up their act while we tax ourselves into bankruptcy. I know, I know, they promise. And these are the people who just can't believe the invisible man in the sky story, but this climate fix fairy tale is gospel? Do these silly fucks even realize just how moronic they sound?
 
But, but, China has promised to try real hard to do better and we should take their word cause you know, they've been so trustworthy in the past. But, but the threat of global catastrophe imminent, and you American evildoers must finance the polluters thereby helping them to grow and pollute more. Errrr, the end is near but the worst polluters have 15 years to clean up their act while we tax ourselves into bankruptcy. I know, I know, they promise. And these are the people who just can't believe the invisible man in the sky story, but this climate fix fairy tale is gospel? Do these silly fucks even realize just how moronic they sound?

Nobody said to take their word for it, there are independent agencies tracking it and they are indeed doing better.

But how is that an excuse, the whole thing was an agreement and if China didn't meet it's goals then you pull out.

And how the hell is 30 billion leading to bankruptcy? LOL

And speaking about worst polluters, why limit it to last 15 years? And why not talk about per capita pollution as well.
 
are we talking about pollution or co2. I believe in conserving the environment and we should limit destruction of resources and pollution to sustainable levels. co2 is not pollution.
 
if it is about co2... how come you don't have any peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming not based on now failed models.

absolutely nothing.

LOL, same lame talking point.

This is about effect of greenhouse gases on the environment, wtf is this pollution nonsense.
 
Back
Top