Everything Conservatives Said About the Paris Climate Agreement Is Already Wrong
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Yet nearly every single source showing actual data and projections related to CO2 emissions in China show the author's assertion to be wrong. Go look at a portion of the 1.52 million hits when you type China CO2 emissions into Google.
you are on drugs... first of all your scientist (published in a paid for play fraud journal) said that the warming may be partially man made.
That certainly is not that same as saying man made co2.
2. you said your scientist did not use models. When you produced the paper we saw he did use models. Models are not the same as proving the science. Models are limited by their inputs.
3. You scientists said he could not rule out natural causes.
4. So you started by saying that it was conclusively proven co2 caused warming.
5. and when we made you produce the paper... it was anything but conclusive.
it was models and the models did not rule out natural causes.
6. you guy was impressed with warmings correlation with co2.
I then produced a paper that said the corellation is about 90 percent but that co2 levels trail warming and cooling... by 9 most for air temps and a year for change in ocean temps.
So in realty everything claimed was wrong...
and there is still no peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming.
QUOTE="exGOPer, post: 4465427, member: 327981"]Looks like Trump is not the only one with Alzheimer's, maybe you forgot the beatdown you were given yesterday when you were forced to admit that anthropogenic climate change is real[/QUOTE]
That certainly is not that same as saying man made co2.
2. you said your scientist did not use models. When you produced the paper we saw he did use models. Models are not the same as proving the science. Models are limited by their inputs.
3. You scientists said he could not rule out natural causes.
4. So you started by saying that it was conclusively proven co2 caused warming.
5. and when we made you produce the paper... it was anything but conclusive.
it was models and the models did not rule out natural causes.
6. you guy was impressed with warmings correlation with co2.
I then produced a paper that said the corellation is about 90 percent but that co2 levels trail warming and cooling... by 9 most for air temps and a year for change in ocean temps.
So in realty everything claimed was wrong...
and there is still no peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming.
QUOTE="exGOPer, post: 4465427, member: 327981"]Looks like Trump is not the only one with Alzheimer's, maybe you forgot the beatdown you were given yesterday when you were forced to admit that anthropogenic climate change is real[/QUOTE]
Last edited:
Jem is simply a pathlogical liar. It's actually rather sad.
Both are exactly the same statements.
If I say exercise leads to good health (a proven fact), that doesn't mean that other factors like genetics and diet are ignored. The first statement still remains true.
It's better you give up debating scientific topics when you have hard time with English language itself.
You are arguing with a psychopath that enjoys deceptive and intellectually dishonest arguing. It's what defense lawyers do for obviously guilty clients and for some reason jerm likes defending the guilty, because he's fucked in the head and all he's become is a desperate mortgage lawyer.
Last edited:
you have no fidelity to logic.
using the word may - means the person writing the words is not sure.
anthropogenic is not synonymous with man made co2.
it could mean other man made gases
it could mean taking down rain forrests
it could mean changing fields in cities and crops.
If your doctor told you drugs may be partially responsible for memory loss
does not mean caffeine is responsible for memory loss because its a drug?
using the word may - means the person writing the words is not sure.
anthropogenic is not synonymous with man made co2.
it could mean other man made gases
it could mean taking down rain forrests
it could mean changing fields in cities and crops.
If your doctor told you drugs may be partially responsible for memory loss
does not mean caffeine is responsible for memory loss because its a drug?
you lying sack of shit.... you said it was conclusively co2 on the other thread where you presented article from your chosen author.
and by the way he said it may be partially anthropogenic.
and I said I agree. we don't know for sure but billions of us probably do have an impact on the planet.
and by the way he said it may be partially anthropogenic.
and I said I agree. we don't know for sure but billions of us probably do have an impact on the planet.
Last edited: