Comey the Clown: Lock him up!!

Interest Conflicts are created when the one, or those, being investigated have a close, special relationship with the investigative body. That wouldn't apply in the case you have cited because Comey was not the one being investigated.
According to the article, the issue was that the whole investigation was totally unwarranted = poor judgment.

*
"Fitzgerald immediately discovered that Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage was the leaker. Of course, the FBI and Department of Justice had known that all along, so Comey’s push for a special counsel is … intriguing.

Not only did they not shut down the investigation that never needed to begin, Comey expanded its mandate within weeks. The three-year investigation was a cloud over the Bush administration and resulted in nothing but the jailing of a journalist for not giving up a source, and a dubious prosecution of Scooter Libby for, wait for it, obstruction of justice. Comey was unconcerned about the jailing of journalists and never threatened to resign over this infringement on First Amendment freedoms."
 
but... if the WaPo or NYT were to simply say they had sources saying Comey is now being investigated. The media could then act like it was true for the next 6 months. And we could get a special counsel investigating Comey and then later the Special Counsel.

Interest Conflicts are created when the one, or those, being investigated have a close, special relationship with the investigative body. That wouldn't apply in the case you have cited because Comey was not the one being investigated.
 
Clintonian Comey Defense Sequence – The Latest: Comey’s Leaked Memos Were “Retroactively Classified”…


The defensive narrative ‘fact pattern’ appears identical in sequencing:

Step 1 – The emails/memos were not classified. √

Step 2 – The emails/memos were not ‘marked’ classified. √

Step 3 – The emails/memos were ‘retroactively classified‘. √

Next up in the logical sequence:

Step 4 – Missing/deleted = Wiped Comey memos: “what, like with a cloth or something?”

Step 5 – Robert Mueller (filling the role of Comey circa 2016) will hold a 2017 presser to say: James Comey didn’t intentionally violate the law with sharing classified information within his leaked memos in 2017. Adding: “we could find no intent” by him to do so.

Step 6 – Mueller will conclude his presser by saying: “no reasonable special counsel would recommend charges“.

Bets?

theconservativetreehouse.com
There is no evidence to suggest that Comey's leaked memo contained any classified information. There is, however, incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, which is the memo itself. There is also Comey's statement under oath.

Some email found on Hillary's computer was apparently marked "confidential" at the time it was received. This is the lowest level of classification, and without being able to show intent this is a transgression against rules that would be nearly impossible, based on precedent , to successfully prosecute. Seems your hopes for a Hillary behind bars are fading fast.
 
but... if the WaPo or NYT were to simply say they had sources saying Comey is now being investigated. The media could then act like it was true for the next 6 months. And we could get a special counsel investigating Comey and then later the Special Counsel.

Why would they lie about a non-existent investigation? When did Wapo or NYT say that Trump was personally under investigation prior to Comeygate? Citation needed
 
why did at least one of those organizations state or very strongly imply Trump was under criminal investigation when he was not? (The point I was making in a sarcastic manner)

by the way I already proved this too you..
why are you such a troll?

====
"very first search result I clicked on.. is from the NYT... and it says places a criminal investigation at the doorstep of the white house... which is cute and wrong and almost criminally misleading.

because we now know Trump was not personally under investigation and it was not a criminal investigation as I had been telling Tony and Piezoe.

and don't try and say... it places a criminal investigation at the door step is not the same as a criminal investigation about trump... read the headline.

if they knew it was not criminal then the way its was worded was really serious libel. Just about the most serious.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/us/politics/fbi-investigation-trump-russia-comey.html

F.B.I. Is Investigating Trump’s Russia Ties, Comey Confirms

....
Mr. Comey’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee created a treacherous political moment for Mr. Trump, who has insisted that “Russia is fake news” that was cooked up by his political opponents to undermine his presidency. Mr. Comey placed a criminal investigation at the doorstep of the White House and said officers would pursue it “no matter how long that takes.”"
 
Last edited:
New batch of Clinton emails out. In one, you can see she signed a nondisclosure agreement - showing she knew they had confidential info.

DEaggZbXsAEhqU0.jpg




DEaggZhXgAAF0M_.jpg




What any reasonable prosecutor should know is that a secretary of state that has signed non disclosure agreements on classified info knows what 'c' stands for and is lying through their teeth if they say they don't.

And then her common law husband meeting with the att gen. There's that, too.

DEbAWwdUMAA-Jsy.jpg




A submarine crew member sends a selfie to his girlfriend while he's in the sub and goes to prison.

Sub sailor's photo case draws comparisons to Clinton emails - POLITICO
www.politico.com/story/2016/05/kristian-saucier-investigation-hillary-clinton-223646
May 27, 2016 -


I guess intent to transmit classified info means something different when you're not a democratic big wig that the deep state would like to insert into the oval office. If you're just a regular guy, it's off to jail with you.


But there's a new sherif in town.
images
 
More lies from FAKE NEWS right-wing media

From the FBI file

"Clinton identified a “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the “(C)” related to the “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer."
 
Back
Top