Comey the Clown: Lock him up!!

The Secretary of State claims she doesn't know C stands for confidential and the FBI director says 'well, that's good enough for me'.

Comey served on the board of HSBC as a result of his work to get the Clintons off in the 90's and now he probably hopes he can get another big payday by subverting the law for them again. It's a pattern for him.
 
fhl said:
The Secretary of State claims she doesn't know C stands for confidential and the FBI director says 'well, that's good enough for me'.
More...

Why do you keep lying?


Clinton identified a “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the “(C)” related to the “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer.
 
piezoe said:
There is no evidence to suggest that Comey's leaked memo contained any classified information. There is, however, incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, which is the memo itself. There is also Comey's statement under oath.

Some email found on Hillary's computer was apparently marked "confidential" at the time it was received. This is the lowest level of classification, and without being able to show intent this is a transgression against rules that would be nearly impossible, based on precedent , to successfully prosecute. Seems your hopes for a Hillary behind bars are fading fast.
More...
Doesn't matter if anything was classified in his memo. It's not for him to decide and the memo's were not his property to do with as he wished.

"The agreement signed by all FBI employees says that "all information acquired by me in connection with my official duties with the FBI and all official material to which I have access remain the property of the United States of America."

It goes on to add that agents "will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI."
 
Optionpro007 said:
he claimed that Stewart’s public protestations of innocence were designed to prop up the stock price of her own company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, and thus constituted securities fraud. Stewart was also charged with making false statements to federal officials investigating the insider trading charge — a charge they never pursued. In essence, Stewart was prosecuted for “having misled people by denying having committed a crime with which she was not charged,” as Cato Institute Senior Fellow Alan Reynolds put it.
More...
This is fake, with just enough elements of truth to make it sound like it's true. Where do you come up with this bullshit! What is wrong with you folks that you continually believe this internet bullshit and then post this crap. (is it zerohedge, Breitbart, or another site that specializes in spreading alternative facts?)

The real charges on which she was convicted by a "jury of her peers" were: conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statement to a federal investigator. In other words, had she told the truth: Waksal told me to sell; my broker called me and told me to sell, or whatever, she would have probably got off. But she lied and got caught. Moral to the story: don't lie. Waksal was convicted on a more serious charge of securities fraud. and her Broker was convicted of essentially the same charges as Stewart.
 
Last edited:
CaptainObvious said:
Doesn't matter if anything was classified in his memo. It's not for him to decide and the memo's were not his property to do with as he wished.
More...

Actually they were, he was the OCA for the FBI.

And who cares with this bullshit, the memos helped us to understand what happened and why, who cares if he leaked it, why should government be able to keep such things secret.
 
piezoe said:
This is fake. Entirely fake. Where do you come up with this bullshit! What is wrong with you folks that you continually believe this internet bullshit. The real charges on which she was convicted by a "jury of her peers" were: conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statement to a federal investigator. In other words, had she just told the truth: Waksal told me to sell; my broker called me and told me to sell, or whatever, she would have probably got off. But she lied and got caught. Moral to the story: don't lie. Waksal was convicted on a more serious charge of securities fraud. and her Broker was convicted of essentially the same charges as Stewart.
More...

I didn't write that story. But if you think it is inaccurate, please contact the writer so she can update the article.

MZHphoto-300x300.jpg

Mollie Hemingway, Senior Editor
Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is a senior editor at The Federalist. A longtime journalist, her work has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, the Los Angeles Times, the Guardian, the Washington Post, CNN, National Review, GetReligion, Ricochet, Christianity Today, Federal Times, Radio & Records and many other publications. Mollie was a 2004 recipient of a Phillips Foundation Journalism Fellowship. Reach her at mzhemingway@thefederalist.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top