obviously but for a trader it is a zero sum gameFor an investor,
obviously but for a trader it is a zero sum gameFor an investor,
you are a jokeSo others experience losses and the cycle continues. It's a losers game.
you are a joke
who wins ?.
everyone loses and where does that money go to.....to GOD?
Source: http://www.forex-ratings.com/forex-interviews/?id=12083
AT: I inferred from your book that using historical data may be a good idea to generate trade ideas, but it isn’t a good way to measure risk. Is any historical data worth testing?
NNT: It is worth analyzing. You cannot ignore past data, but you have to be careful about what you’re interpreting from it. You can’t [use it to determine the probability of rare events]. Large deviations can’t easily be seen from past data.
The bell-shape distribution is a fraud. For the bell curve, much of the deviations are delivered by regular volatility. But in the markets, much of the deviations are delivered by the tails (extremely large, infrequent moves). People use the bell curve because it simplifies things and gives the illusion of understanding what’s going on.
If you use past volatility to predict future volatility, it would hardly predict anything. The bell curve does not apply to something that has fat tails. Now, Mandelbrot’s theory of Power Laws distribution is used everywhere except in finance — in science, in sociology, and on the Internet. (For more details about the bell curve and Taleb’s argument, see “Taleb’s critique of the bell curve”).
Put it back in context of my post.
The “others” in this case, are the “pattern seekers” that took notice of this supposed “support” and “resistance” so they followed because they are predicting that it’ll hold.
So it goes to the supposed “support” and they buy, and goes to the supposed “resistance” and they sell, then it goes back to the supposed “support” and they buy, then it goes down lower because there was no more “support” to their surprise. Then the share in there hand loses value, and they experience loss. No one gains from there experiencing of loss in this specific instance. Are you still rambling about zero sum and trying to make a point. I still don’t know what you’re after.
you are a joke
who wins ?.
everyone loses and where does that money go to.....to GOD?
so if it is not a zero sum game, people lose more that all the money that goes in or they make more than all the money that goes in.....
you are a joke
either money is disappearing or it is being born out of thin air
i do it all the time i agree.if you ever put a moving average on a chart
of course it is irrelevant to the day trader.it's a zero sum game or not is irrelevant to the day trader
Ok what is this signal in yearly charts u see ?? is this universally defined ?? is this your own definition ?If you zoom out to yearly charts, you begin to see some signal, if you zoom out to 5 year charts, you begin to see even more signal in the data. But you cannot tell me you see signal when it really is noise, on a intra-day or daily chart.