Quote from Free Thinker:
lest you think keeping women in second class position is something from the past and does not happen anymore. think again. a church i used to attend and still keep in touch with member friends does not allow women in any position of leadership. as a woman member you can advance no further than a sunday school teacher. you can not be a pastor,a church elder, on the leadership committee or even an usher. you are not allowed to give men direction. you are only allowed to follow direction.
the women seem to have no problem with it. i never heard any public complaints. muslim women who have to cover their faces seem to have no problem either. brainwashing is a powerful force.
Quote from Free Thinker:
...the women seem to have no problem with it. i never heard any public complaints. muslim women who have to cover their faces seem to have no problem either. brainwashing is a powerful force.
no it was a breakaway sect of baptists. nothing out of the mainstream other that they believe the bible 100% literal. there were no written rules on dress. most men and women dressed casual. some of the younger girls pushed the limits with short shorts. every once in a while you would get a sermon on modest dress.Quote from PatternRec:
Sounds like a Plymouth Brethren assembly. But could be a number of others. In Brethren, women also have to cover their heads.
Quote from Free Thinker:
education is the best weapon against superstition:
Quote from Lucrum:
Then I suppose that makes you an educator of sorts.
Tell me, what is the name of the teaching/education method you're using called? You know, where the "educator" is self righteous, arrogant, demeaning and condescending? I'm not familiar with that method. Are they using it in schools somewhere?
My point being your potential "students" might be more receptive of your lectures, such as they are, if you weren't such a dick about it all.
Quote from Lucrum:
Then I suppose that makes you an educator of sorts.
Tell me, what is the name of the teaching/education method you're using called? You know, where the "educator" is self righteous, arrogant, demeaning and condescending? I'm not familiar with that method. Are they using it in schools somewhere?
My point being your potential "students" might be more receptive of your lectures, such as they are, if you weren't such a dick about it all.