Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong
- Thread starter jficquette
- Start date
The key is possibilities, isn't it?
Neither are open and shut cases, which means they are flawed...
Neither are flawless, are they?
Neither are open and shut cases, which means they are flawed...
Neither are flawless, are they?
Personal conjecture about mindless chance and Bible creation have no effect on evolution being a fact as gravity is a fact.
Other possibilities out there include the absurd, which you, as a creationist, do not reject as key positions although they are terribly flawed.
Possibilities like your imaginary ultimate celestial God Goblin, which is supposed to be able to magic stuff only because of the terribly flawed position that assuming the preposterous stands against fact.
You repeatedly stating something is a fact, of course does not make it a fact....it mostly makes you look as foolish as a right wing pundit who repeatedly states untruth enough to convince the non thinkers that something is a fact...when it is not.
Evolution is not a fact, it is a theory that is lacking the necessary components to qualify it for fact status...
The manner in which you describe God goes to illustrate your own immature understanding of the concept of God (imaginary ultimate celestial God Goblin) which is rooted in your own small minded Judeo-Christian past...sorry about your miserably limited concept of God, but fret not...that is a disease common to the west among both the theists and atheists...
Evolution is not a fact, it is a theory that is lacking the necessary components to qualify it for fact status...
The manner in which you describe God goes to illustrate your own immature understanding of the concept of God (imaginary ultimate celestial God Goblin) which is rooted in your own small minded Judeo-Christian past...sorry about your miserably limited concept of God, but fret not...that is a disease common to the west among both the theists and atheists...
stu you've been quibbling and bickering for so long with optional I forgot what your point was if you had one to start with.
So I'll go ahead and ask.
What is your point?
So I'll go ahead and ask.
What is your point?
His point is and always has been you and your ilk have NEVER provided credible evidence for creationism. Till then your just pissing in the wind
Good job in illustrating the ultimate flaw in the atheistic Darwinist position.
It doesn't matter if the creationists (the Christian fundamentalist breed) has produced credible evidence or not.
What matters is that the atheistic evolutionists have pinned their entire concept of random unguided ignorant chance as the causation for life.
When this is pointed out, the atheistic types attack, rather than defend the concept of random unguided ignorant chance...why is that?
Because they actually have no defense, no fact, and no proof that the change we see in species is not in fact guided.
We don't know...and if we don't know, there is no reason to assume guided or unguided...
So why not just admit we don't know, we observe and create theories...but to embrace them as fact, or to suggest that that proves the creationists wrong, is such a flawed and fallacious thought process as to reveal the true underbelly of the atheistic Darwinist as not being truly scientific at all...
It doesn't matter if the creationists (the Christian fundamentalist breed) has produced credible evidence or not.
What matters is that the atheistic evolutionists have pinned their entire concept of random unguided ignorant chance as the causation for life.
When this is pointed out, the atheistic types attack, rather than defend the concept of random unguided ignorant chance...why is that?
Because they actually have no defense, no fact, and no proof that the change we see in species is not in fact guided.
We don't know...and if we don't know, there is no reason to assume guided or unguided...
So why not just admit we don't know, we observe and create theories...but to embrace them as fact, or to suggest that that proves the creationists wrong, is such a flawed and fallacious thought process as to reveal the true underbelly of the atheistic Darwinist as not being truly scientific at all...
Quote from killthesunshine:
His point is and always has been you and your ilk have NEVER provided credible evidence for creationism. Till then your just pissing in the wind
To answer that, let me ask you something.
Flat Earth is neither a scientific fact or a theory right?
Gravity is a scientific fact and a theory right?
Evolution is a scientific fact and a theory right?
So how come you are not asking OptionalZZzzz who says Gravity and Evolution are not a fact, "what is your point"??
Good point pointing out IP's disingenuous inconsistent statements