Why creation science is an oxymoron

Quote from killthesunshine:

what you fail to grasp..

atheists believe in the rules of evidence and reason. rationality.

to claim i don't believe in "ghosts", or unicorms or gremlins or (insert any nonsense here) is to say I believe in the rational, in the rules of evidence because those rules are forged in 10's of 1000's of years of experience and reflective thought.

YOU, on other hand are caught up in some semantic bullshit from which has trapped your mind, your soul and from which you can never escape. and will hamper you throughout your life. look past the words to the MEANING! :eek:


I'm not failing to grasp anything moron.

I know what belief is and I have a general idea what you consider evidence.

Problem is I accept evidence that you summarily dismiss that's why it's a "belief" on both sides of the equation.

Unfortunately for you , you seem to be under the impression that everything that you believe or accept as true has been subjected to the rigors of evidence which you demand here and that there is only 1 universally accepted answer.

That my friend is patently false, thirty years ago scientists were convinced we were in a new ice age and stomach ulcers were caused by stress.

Today it's global warming and known bacteria

Please explain the rigorous scientific proof that liberalism, and Keynesian economics is correct or any other philosophy on life issues?
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

i don't get it...

are you suggesting that a scientific theory is equivalent to an opinion as reliable knowledge? :confused:

No, he's saying you did asshole, lest we start letting your pigshit for reason start flying.
 
Quote from Index piker:

I'm not failing to grasp anything moron.

I know what belief is and I have a general idea what you consider evidence.

Problem is I accept evidence that you summarily dismiss that's why it's a "belief" on both sides of the equation.


your "rules of evidence" obviously is at odds with modern conception and more in keeping with Dark Age ideation. please enlighten us with your new found rules :D
 
Quote from Index piker:

No, he's saying you did asshole, lest we start letting your pigshit for reason start flying.

What's with all the anger? What would Jesus say?
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

your "rules of evidence" obviously is at odds with modern conception and more in keeping with Dark Age ideation. please enlighten us with your new found rules :D

I was referring to my evidence for belief not proof to non-believers.
I hold many beliefs that are not provable in a laboratory without chance of error.

I admit this unlike you and you disingenuous colleagues.

Besides science is wisely specifically mum about making a conclusion as to the existence of "God".

keep twisting in the wind,my friend you are amusing.

Good Day
 
Quote from hermit:

1)What's with all the anger? 2)What would Jesus say?

1) I'm not angry. I think he's an asshole. I'm pretty much coming to the same conclusion about you.

2) Yes, what would jesus say to kts?
 
Quote from Index piker:

I was referring to my evidence for belief not proof to non-believers.
I hold many beliefs that are not provable in a laboratory without chance of error.

I admit this unlike you and you disingenuous colleagues.

Besides science is wisely specifically mum about making a conclusion as to the existence of "God".

keep twisting in the wind,my friend you are amusing.

Good Day

do you hold the medically confirmed schizo's belief equal in measure and truth to your own? should WE the rest of humanity simply accept any proposition equal to another? yours, the schizo's or anyones' or should we apply some measure forged in human experience and reason?

or maybe your truth is divinely inspired and therefore requires special consideration?
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

do you hold the medically confirmed schizo's belief equal in measure and truth to your own? should WE the rest of humanity simply accept any proposition equal to another? yours, the schizo's or anyones' or should we apply some measure forged in human experience and reason?

or maybe your truth is divinely inspired and therefore requires special consideration?

You're babbling, how about making a cogent post, next time.
 
Back
Top