Which monotheistic God would that be?
Please state the part of the Constitution violated.
btw
dd that all of a sudden a leftist loser is concerned about the constitution. I'm waiting for the followup obligatory earthquake or pigs flying.
Why creation science is an oxymoron
- Thread starter kut2k2
- Start date
Which monotheistic God would that be?
Please state the part of the Constitution violated.
btw
dd that all of a sudden a leftist loser is concerned about the constitution. I'm waiting for the followup obligatory earthquake or pigs flying.It doesn't matter actually when it was added.
Women couldn't vote for a long time, slavery was legal, etc.
So just because something new comes along, that doesn't make it wrong...in fact correction of mistakes is a progressive quality.
Why not start a movement to get a constitutional amendment to ban God on money and the voluntary pledge of allegiance?
Or why not make a real protest and swear off money?
Go on a money strike the way Gandhi went on hunger strikes...
Women couldn't vote for a long time, slavery was legal, etc.
So just because something new comes along, that doesn't make it wrong...in fact correction of mistakes is a progressive quality.
Why not start a movement to get a constitutional amendment to ban God on money and the voluntary pledge of allegiance?
Or why not make a real protest and swear off money?
Go on a money strike the way Gandhi went on hunger strikes...
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
It doesn't matter actually when it was added.
Women couldn't vote for a long time, slavery was legal, etc.
Universal suffrage is a scourge.
It doesn't matter. Not every American is a monotheist. This blatant promotion of monotheism is illegal. Why do you think the Founding Fathers didn't do it?
Read the First Amendment.
Strawman. I can find more disdain for the Constitution on the right than on the left.Quote from Index piker:
btw
"That goddamned piece of paper" -- George W. Bush
oh bloody hell I'm one of them so puhleeze show me where the govt is promoting monotheism.
Quote which part you think is violated by having "In God we trust" on our currency.
Evidently our loser here thinks"In God we trust" on our currency promotes monotheism and establishes a state religion.
I mean how stupid and paranoid do you have to be.
Another bedwetting liberal bites the dust.
That's a good point.
Some theists apparently will instruct themselves literally by the dictionary, straight into contradiction.
Still I suppose they are used to doing that going by how, as they describe, it's the same way their religion makes them believe.
In other words...only you are allowed to interject yourself into religious threads.
But people who don't agree with what is said every time you do interject yourself into religious threads, is called a "turd" and a "zealot" ....as if you couldn't be either.
Ah... so a person can have no belief.
Well that should come as a revelation to at least 3 other religious "zealots" on this board who imagine people can't have.... no belief!!
Still begs the question; - so go on Jem, at least try to guess what that question might be..."So if you have no belief you are ........" what exactly ?!
"... you are not an atheist. " .... oh right, then someone with no belief is supposed to be what exactly.
A theist !?
No belief in Gods in Heavens, does not force anyone to have to conclude whether there is or there is not any such thing as a God, any more than no belief in Dragons in Attics forces anyone to conclude whether there is or there is not any such thing as a Dragon.
The turnip argument from stu...it never gets old.
Piles and piles of atheism...
<img src=http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/elephant20shit1.jpg>
Piles and piles of atheism...
<img src=http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/elephant20shit1.jpg>
Quote from stu:
That's a good point.
Some theists apparently will instruct themselves literally by the dictionary, straight into contradiction.
Still I suppose they are used to doing that going by how, as they describe, it's the same way their religion makes them believe.
In other words...only you are allowed to interject yourself into religious threads.
But people who don't agree with what is said every time you do interject yourself into religious threads, is called a "turd" and a "zealot" ....as if you couldn't be either.
Ah... so a person can have no belief.
Well that should come as a revelation to at least 3 other religious "zealots" on this board who imagine people can't have.... no belief!!
Still begs the question; - so go on Jem, at least try to guess what that question might be..."So if you have no belief you are ........" what exactly ?!
"... you are not an atheist. " .... oh right, then someone with no belief is supposed to be what exactly.
A theist !?
No belief in Gods in Heavens, does not force anyone to have to conclude whether there is or there is not any such thing as a God, any more than no belief in Dragons in Attics forces anyone to conclude whether there is or there is not any such thing as a Dragon.