Quote from LodeRunner:
Hilarious. We have two people who actually address and debate the real issue, then a dozen more who blindly spout off with the same ole irrelevant pro-gold, anti-fiat rant. This has nothing to do with fiat vs. non-fiat. The fact that only a couple of you have grasped this so far only confirms my suspicions. Wish I could make money off of this but this level of stupid will die hard, and there no easy way for me to be a 'long term short.'
There is no need for a gold standard, because such 'standards' were necessary due only to pre-eletronic age illiquidity. If we return to commodity-backed money, it'll be some kind of exotic weighted basket thing. Or do you think the countries of the world will happily elect the USA to become even richer than we already are? (fort knox + the Fed's vault...)
Gold to hit an inflation-adjusted $300 within our lifetimes. That is all. You may now return to your mindless and irrelevant anti-fiat regurgitations.
You are missing one important fact: confidence. There is none at the moment. Reduction in deficits, increased economic ouput, and rising interest rates, would raise confidence, and therefore help gold to fall somewhat. You'll never see gold below 1,000 again, though. The 300 target is a pipe dream.
Nice , old ,gold uptrend, complete with higher volume bear/ volume sells................................