Which country you see as biggest threat to World peace

I'm saying we have no business there. One, it is far from clear where our best interests lie. Would we have been better off if we had left Saddam Hussein in place? It certainly seems so now. Would we have been better off not to have undermined the Shah of Iran and handed the country over to the Ayatollahs? I'd say so. Was it a great idea to undermine Mubarrek in Egypt and watch the muslim brotherhood take over? Obama thought so, I didn't. Neither did the Egyptians. How's that Libyan adventure working out for us now?

Two, and in agreement with your point, our forces are so constrained by the modern law of warfare, our intrusive courts, the world media and various human rights busybodies, that it is impossible for our forces to even protect themselves, much less secure territory and defeat determined enemies. Under those conditions, it is immoral to put them into those situations, particularly when the only objective is teaching someone a lesson or scoring political points.

Lemme ask... If GWB hadn't wanted to impress his daddy for being a "war president"... and had never "gone into Iraq" under the false pretense of "Saddam's WMDs"... might we have never become involved in this ME mess? Might there not even be such a mess? Which if we're not responsible for starting, we're surely culpable for having (needlessly?) escalated it.

:(
 
The United States is probably the biggest threat.
See...this is what happens. You have expounded what you really think. We try to do what appears to be some good in response to some evil and we become the villain. Nobody asks "who provoked the attack?" They are the real villains. But no we will become more detested by attacking little syria. The only one that will praise this attack are the globalist elite whose have an interest in this. You can bet the flood of refugees into Europe is related to this as a means to solve this refugee problem. It has become too taxing for Europe.

We cannot solve syria's civil war. Leave them alone. Let them work thru these problems. It always ends badly for us. It is paternalism in the worst way. It is arrogance in the worst way. Only we know best for the world! We would do much better tending to our own business and issues. Others would then learn to respect us instead of hating us. But no $$$$ and Power are so addictive. Globalism offers both "par excellence" for the elite.
 
This is not entirely correct. But there are elements I can agree with.. We and Isreal have been major destabilizers of the Middle East. It is wrong, however, to include Soros in that mix, and maybe some of the others. Soros is a complex individual. His foundations' funding is not done casually. A lot of introspection and thought goes in to it. There are real experts involved. His intention always is to be both anti-totalitarian and anti-war. For example, the last thing a person who thinks as deeply as Soros does would want is to replace totalitarian leadership with chaos. He is, as an individual, the leading proponent of peace and freedom in the world.


If that's your opinion of Soros, then we will have to leave it at that because I think he is quite possibly the most evil man on the planet.

He is directly funding death and destruction in the US and in many parts of Europe.

To leftists like Soros and yourself, freedom and peace generally equates to = eradication of borders, extreme gun control and tight speech restrictions.

To me that sounds like the opposite of freedom and peace.

The ends always justify the means to guys like Soros, and the "ends" never live up to their intention because the "means" involves centralization of power. And since power corrupts, the exact opposite of what is intended occurs.
 
Last edited:
I think he is quite possibly the most evil man on the planet.
I understand that many people believe that. My only response is that I believe he's been done a great disservice. I can understand why he seldom gets personally involved in responding to all the accusations he is subjected to. What I can recommend to you highly is to get a hold of either anything he himself has written about his foundations or his his personal philosophy. There is a good book out on his Open Society Foundations called the "Philanthropy of George Soros." You owe it to yourself to question what you may have heard, get the real facts, then make up your own mind. The Foundations publish annual reports. There are billions of dollars involved, and of course he doesn't, can't really, get much involved in day to day detail.
 
Here is a prism or filter worth checking when the dems and the McCain are on the same side and the MSM is calling for war... for no damn good reason.

I am not saying the Private Central bankers engage our war machine to take down non central banking machines... but the history is tough to discount...

Note... Putin has been at war with his central bankers and Syria resists the private central bankers and the IMF.



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-10/guess-how-many-nations-world-do-not-have-central-bank

Central banking has truly taken over the entire planet. At this point, the only major nation on the globe that does not have a central bank is North Korea. Yes, there are some small island countries such as the Federated States of Micronesia that do not have a central bank, but even if you count them, more than 99.9% of the population of the world still lives in a country that has a central bank.

So how has this happened? How have we gotten the entire planet to agree that central banking is the best system? Did the people of the world willingly choose this? Of course not. To my knowledge, there has never been a single vote where the people of a nation have willingly chosen to establish a central bank. Instead, what has happened is that central banks have been imposed on all of us.

All over the world, people have been told that monetary issues are “too important” to be subject to politics, and that the only solution is to have a group of unelected, unaccountable bankers control those things for us.

So precisely what does a central bank do?

You would be surprised at how few people can actually answer that question accurately. The following is how Wikipedia describes what a central bank does…



A central bank, reserve bank, or monetary authority is an institution that manages a state’s currency, money supply, and interest rates. Central banks also usually oversee the commercial banking system of their respective countries. In contrast to a commercial bank, a central bank possesses a monopoly on increasing the monetary base in the state, and usually also prints the national currency, which usually serves as the state’s legal tender. Examples include the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve of the United States and the People’s Bank of China.

In the United States, we are told that we have a free market system. But in a true free market system, market forces would determine what interest rates are. We wouldn’t need anyone to “set interest rates” for us.

And why have we given a private banking cartel (the Federal Reserve) the authority to create and manage our money supply? The U.S. Constitution specifically delegates that authority to Congress.

It is not as if we actually need the Federal Reserve. In fact, the greatest period of economic growth in U.S. history happened during the decades before the Federal Reserve was created.

Unfortunately, a little over 100 years ago our leaders decided that it would be best to turn over our financial future to a newly created private banking cartel that was designed by very powerful Wall Street interests. Since that time, the value of our currency has diminished by more than 96 percent and our national debt has gotten more than 5000 times larger.

But despite all of the problems, the vast majority of Democrats and the vast majority of Republicans are not even willing to consider slightly curtailing the immense power of the Federal Reserve. And the idea of getting rid of the Fed altogether is tantamount to blasphemy to most of our politicians.

Of course the same thing is true all over the planet. Central banks are truly “the untouchables” of the modern world. Even though everybody can see what they are doing, there has not been a single successful political movement anywhere on the globe (that I know about) to shut a central bank down.

Instead, in recent years we have just seen the reach of central banking just continue to expand.

For example, just look at what has happened to some of the countries that were not considered to be “integrated” into the “global community”…

-In 2001, the United States invaded Afghanistan. In 2003, Da Afghanistan Bank (who picked that name?) was established by presidential decree. You can find the official website of the bank right here. Now Afghanistan has a modern central bank just like the rest of us.

-In 2003, the United States invaded Iraq. In early 2004, the Central Bank of Iraq was established to manage the Iraqi currency and integrate Iraq into the global financial system. The following comes from the official website of the Central Bank of Iraq



Following the deposition of Saddam Hussein in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Iraqi Governing Council and the Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance began printing more Saddam dinar notes as a stopgap measure to maintain the money supply until new currency could be introduced.



The Banking Law was issued September 19, 2003. The law brings Iraq’s legal framework for banking in line with international standards, and seeks to promote confidence in the banking system by establishing a safe, sound, competitive and accessible banking system.



Between October 15, 2003 and January 15, 2004, the Coalition Provisional Authority issued new Iraqi dinar coins and notes, with the notes printed using modern anti-forgery techniques, to “create a single unified currency that is used throughout all of Iraq and will also make money more convenient to use in people’s everyday lives. Old banknotes were exchanged for new at a one-to-one rate, except for the Swiss dinars, which were exchanged at a rate of 150 new dinars for one Swiss dinar.

The Central Bank of Iraq (Arabic: ????? ??????? ???????) was established as Iraq’s independent central bank by the Central Bank of Iraq Law of March 6, 2004

-In 2011, the United States bombed the living daylights out of Libya. Before Muammar Gaddafi was even overthrown, the U.S. helped the rebels establish a new Central Bank of Libya and form a new national oil company.

Central banks are specifically designed to trap nations in debt spirals from which they can never possibly escape. Today, the debt to GDP ratio for the entire planet is up to an all-time high record of 286 percent. Humanity is being enslaved by a perpetual debt machine, but most people are not even aware that it is happening.

It is time for an awakening. We need to educate as many people as possible about why we need to get rid of the central banks. For those living in the United States, my previous article entitled “On The 100th Anniversary Of The Federal Reserve Here Are 100 Reasons To Shut It Down Forever” is a good place to start. In other countries, we need people to write similar articles about their own central banks in their own languages.

The global elite dominate us because we allow them to dominate us. Their debt-based system greatly enriches them while it enslaves the remainder of the planet. We need to expose their evil system and the dark agenda behind it while we still have time.







https://www.rt.com/op-edge/syria-world-hate-message-604/

8 reasons the New World Order hates Syria
1) Syria’s Central Bank is state-owned & controlled – In other words, it manages its national currency so that it serves the Syrian people and not the Rothschild-controlled global bankers operating from their New York, London, Frankfurt, Tel Aviv, Basel and Paris hideouts.

This means that the volume of currency it issues is in proper sync with the true needs of real economy of work, labor, production and all that is useful to Syria’s people, instead of being in sync with parasitic, usurious, speculative foreign financiers. The latter seek to control local central banks so they can artificially limit the volume of currency available for genuine economic needs, especially the no-interest credit needed to finance useful things in the real economy: power plants, roads, gas works, housing, private enterprise and initiatives. This forces productive players – public and private - to have to resort to deadly interest and usury-based private banking loans whereupon the eternal debt chain starts to grow and grow as the so-called ‘sovereign debt crises’ that hit country after country throughout decades of time eloquently show.

By artificially distorting the volume of ‘public currency’ issued by sovereign central banks that generates no interest, countries are thus forced to resort to high interest bearing ‘private currency’ (loans) handled by the monopolistic private bankster cabal in the hands of Rothschild, Rockefeller, Warburg, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, CitiCorp, JP Morgan Chase interests.

Clearly, a very good reason for these parasitic banksters to want to take out Syria.

girl.jpg


2) Syria has no IMF (International Monetary Fund) debt. This means that Syria’s leadership understands that the IMF – a public multilateral agency of member governments - is controlled by the global mega-bankers, and acts as their auditor and debt collection police whenever one of its weaker member states runs into sovereign debt trouble, which is another way of saying when those countries reach a point where they cannot siphon enough money out of their real economies - the work, toil and labor of its people - to hand it over to the parasitic private global bankers.

In a sense, the IMF’s real job is to act as the global power elite’s tax office – its ‘IRS’ so to speak – only that it does not tax people directly, but rather through proxy government and nation-states’ tax offices. Are we starting to understand the real roots of the ‘debt crises’ hitting Greece, Cyprus, Ireland, Argentina, Spain, Italy, UK, US, Portugal, France?

Global slavery couldn’t have been better thought out and planned!

Actually, true Islamic nations rightly reject banking fractional lending and interest practices as being immoral. That’s what Libya’s Gaddafi did, and what Syria and Iran presently do.

Clearly, a very good reason for parasitic banksters to want to take out Syria, just as they took out Libya and now target Iran.

3) Syria has banned genetically modified (GMO) seeds – Bashar Assad banned GMO’s in order “to preserve human health,” knowing full well that the Monsantos of this world are out to control the world’s entire food supply, because coming global crises will not only be about oil, but about how much food countries will be able to put on their people’s tables.

That’s why after invading Iraq, the US ordered that only Monsanto seeds should to be used. That’s why submissive client states like Argentina are poisoning their own soil and people by bowing down really low to Monsanto’s demands.

Clearly, a very good reason for Monsanto to want to take out Syria.

4) Syria’s population is well informed about the New World Order - Its media and universities openly debate the global power elite’s influence in things. This means that they fully grasp the fact that real power in the West lies not in the White House, 10 Downing Street, Congress or Parliament, but rather with the complex and powerful grid of elite think-tanks led by New York’s Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Conference, Trilateral Commission, Americas Society, World Economic forum and London’s Royal Institute of International Affairs, which interact with mega-bankers, media, universities, the military, multinationals and the corporate over-world.

As our young friend aptly explains, Syrians dare to talk about secret societies like Freemasonry or Yale University’s Skull & Bone Lodge whose members include top cats like former President George W Bush and current Secretary of State John Kerry.

Clearly, a very good reason for those top cats to order their errand boy Obama to take out Syria.

5) Syria has massive oil and gas reserves – here we go again! Every time the West goes to war to protect “freedom, human rights and democracy,” there’s always the nauseous stench of oil; whether in Iraq, Libya, Kuwait, the Falklands, Afghanistan… Syria has offshore and onshore oil and gas reserves, and is helping to build a massive pipeline together with Iran, but without Western oil giants’ control. Clearly, the full militarization of all oil production and reserve zones, and the militarization of transportation routes to ‘bring oil home’ from everywhere in the world, is a key on-going joint US/UK strategy.


syria-gas.jpg


Clearly, a very good reason for BP, Exxon, Royal Dutch Shell, Texaco, Total, Repsol and Chevron to want to take out Syria.

6) Syria clearly and unequivocally opposes Zionism and Israel - Israel practices criminal racist apartheid against the occupied Palestinians. Syria’s leadership has no qualms in accusing Israel of being what it is: a racist, imperialist, genocidal entity, as the Wall of Hate Israel erected around Palestine clearly shows. Israel manages what can only be described as an Auschwitz-like mega-concentration camp in Palestine with millions of ill-treated, often-assassinated and humiliated prisoners.

Such geopolitical clarity of mind was shared by Gadhafi’s Libya and Saddam’s Iraq, and today also by Iran, China, Russia and India.

Clearly a very good reason for political juggernauts like AIPAC (American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee), the World Jewish Congress, the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), Likud, Kadima and Netanyahu/Lieberman to want to take out Syria.

7) Syria is one of the last secular Muslim states in the Middle East, whilst Zionist Jewish supremacists - in line with born-again-Israel-First-Bushite ‘Christian’ kooks in the West - need for everybody to align to the will of their dark demiurge god which has its own ‘chosen people’.

The Global Power Elite’s implicit order is clear: everybody must believe in Israeli superiority, whilst our young Syrian friend aptly points out that Syria, like Saddam’s Iraq, Gaddafi’s Libya and Iran just could not be convinced of that.

She adds that in Syria, “asking about religion is not polite,” because Syria has bred many of mankind’s prime religions for thousands of years, and those millennia have taught Syrians to be sensitive, tolerant and respectful of all creeds. Something we clearly do not see in the pro-West Arabian sheikdoms, nor in the US, UK and EU with its anti-Islamic paranoia, and where laws are passed imposing the most blatant cultural, political and historical lies demanded by religious bigots who insist that their god will only accept their own holocaust offerings.

Clearly, another very good reason for neocon fanatics and their Orwellian Thought Police to want to take out Syria.

8) Syria proudly maintains and protects its political and cultural national identity – she stresses how Syria “holds on to its uniqueness,” whilst respecting the uniqueness of others. The standardized coming world government simply abhors anybody standing up to its imposed standardization of thought, behavior and ‘values’, where the West’s global megabrands, shopping malls, and fashion & style dictatorships “makes every place look pretty much the same, which leads to a very boring world.”
 
as you have told us before when we point out the bad stuff that is done with his money... soros is not responsible. But... you of course want to give him credit for the stuff you consider good. We get it. you are paid to write stuff supporting big govt... soros and private central banks. you get annoyed when others show you that the FED system is owned by shareholders and the govt does not own any of the shares.

I understand that many people believe that. My only response is that I believe he's been done a great disservice. I can understand why he seldom gets personally involved in responding to all the accusations he is subjected to. What I can recommend to you highly is to get a hold of either anything he himself has written about his foundations or his his personal philosophy. There is a good book out on his Open Society Foundations called the "Philanthropy of George Soros." You owe it to yourself to question what you may have heard, get the real facts, then make up your own mind. The Foundations publish annual reports. There are billions of dollars involved, and of course he doesn't, can't really, get much involved in day to day detail.
 
See...this is what happens. You have expounded what you really think. We try to do what appears to be some good in response to some evil and we become the villain. Nobody asks "who provoked the attack?" They are the real villains. But no we will become more detested by attacking little syria. The only one that will praise this attack are the globalist elite whose have an interest in this. You can bet the flood of refugees into Europe is related to this as a means to solve this refugee problem. It has become too taxing for Europe.

We cannot solve syria's civil war. Leave them alone. Let them work thru these problems. It always ends badly for us. It is paternalism in the worst way. It is arrogance in the worst way. Only we know best for the world! We would do much better tending to our own business and issues. Others would then learn to respect us instead of hating us. But no $$$$ and Power are so addictive. Globalism offers both "par excellence" for the elite.

You're making the (incorrect) assumption that my answer is predicated on last night's attack on Syria. I assure you this is just the latest example of a long line of efforts from the US to stabilize, but instead result in more instability, into a particular nation's influence.

I am in agreement with you, we should be leaving any one and anything that is not an imminent threat to the United States the hell alone. Focus our incredible resources on solving our own issues and any direct threats. We have both enabled the world to rely on us to answer every question, and given the rest of the world a target to attack and blame when things go pear-shaped. For absolutely no reward whatsoever, I might add.
 
Not in China, Vietnam, India, Mexico, "Former Soviet 'Satellites'", nor in the United States, where foreign-branded automobile factories make and export products including Subaru, Toyota, BMW (largest?), Daimler, Honda.......

https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth
I take you have never lived there and seen so called pseudo prosperity. Only the corporations prosper and the corporate world..oh also the politicians..on both sides..don't want to forget those benevolent folks now do we?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top