I take you have never lived there and seen so called pseudo prosperity. Only the corporations prosper and the corporate world..oh also the politicians..on both sides..don't want to forget those benevolent folks now do we?
The report is lies for all to believe. All part and parcel of selling the globalist plan.
The humanitarian in me is *very* sympathetic to the thought that numbers don't measure all, but the scientist in me replies (with complete dispassion), "Numbers is the best we's got."
So, number-wise, should I remark about global expected life-spans over the past century? Should I remark about overall population growth?
Would it be troublesome to observe that infant mortality in inner-city U.S. cohorts has been way high on the list, and easily beaten by lesser-income countries?
My sweetheart is all fuzzy-warm about organic this-n-that, and grass-fed, hand-rubbed, talked-nice-to blah-blah-blah animal products. Hates any thought of commercial farming. And remarks, "You never see unhealthy animals in the wild."
That's cuz they're all dead, Honey.
We see lots of poverty today. But I have to look at the numbers and surmise, "...of people who would otherwise be dead?"
It's not my place to say whose life is worthy or not.
Last edited: