lol
You're probably much more intelligent than I am -- though I may understand the game a little bit better due to my experience working on the street (analyst/trading/pm).Your level of sophistication far exceeds my simple “model,” I will grant you that. It is nothing short of impressive. But I have neither the acumen nor the resources to compete at that level. I completed my MBA in 1984, with most of the electives in finance. When I took investment finance courses at that time, they largely focused on CAPM (texts by Sharpe). I barely got through them with Bs, and determined then and there that a career in investments was not in the cards for me if that was how it got done. Your description brings those same feelings back home to me.
What are your thoughts on Soros’ theory of reflexivity, and how does it factor into your trading, if at all?
Yes for $500/mo you too can get premium demark indicators lolLOL
"The DeMark indicators are sophisticated standalone market-timing tools, but they can also be used with more traditional technical studies such as: Moving averages, Momentum oscillators, Trendlines, Fibonacci retracements, and Elliott wave." "Differentiating between trading ranges and trend exhaustion is a problem that has long plagued traders in every market sector. In a sea of predominantly trend-following technical studies, one set of contrarian market-timing indicators stands out from the rest, precisely because it is predictive: DeMark indicators were designed specifically to anticipate trend reversals. Their creator, Tom DeMark, has served as consultant to such revered money managers as George Soros, Paul Tudor Jones, and Steven A. Cohen."
I don't need to. I got DeMark authorized studies through TradeStation 20+ years ago and they still work thank you very much.Yes for $500/mo you too can get premium demark indicators lol
You missed the satire. $500/mo. is less than the cocaine daily dealers tip at P72.I don't need to. I got DeMark authorized studies through TradeStation 20+ years ago and they still work thank you very much.
Isn't TA great. lol
Shows how much you pay attention. I've mentioned it numerous times and post charts image out the ying, yang yet you still spot ignorance nonsense, like you are some great authority - on something you don't even use.
And about "ALL" of Wall Street doesn't use it. All of Wall Street doesn't use one thing and one thing only - assume much. You need to get out more often.
Of course TA can be chit -some works, some doesn't.
Same goes for the folks saying it doesn't work at all.
Assume again ... and again and ...You missed the satire. $500/mo. is less than the cocaine daily dealers tip at P72.
HFs are spending millions of dollars in payroll, data, and research tools... and your takeaway is that a $500/mo. line item provides the validity of your entire process.![]()
(SIVB)Oh, that's gonna leave a bruise. Better rub some dirt on it.(SIVB) yuuuge drop today - nothing funnymental about that, for shareholders. -$663.22 a share on touching today's low of $100 even. Oh wait that is since hitting all time a few months ago. That's right it was down overall -$663.22 from its high of $763.22 back in November. Today's drop was "only" $166 of the total $663. drop.
But hey it closed up $6 from the LOD. Likely only because some weak shorts got squeezed. Prolly more pain as soon as hmmm tomorrow. Scan those spreadchits some more, crank up those algos, disseminate that info - got weiners like this one to find.
View attachment 308419
What exactly am I assuming lol?Assume again ... and again and ...