What If...

Quote from hapaboy:

Coins, it's amazing how one dimensional your thinking is. You characterize Islam as a whole as being simply a religion of violence and revenge, and refuse to take into consideration that the problems we have, at least the VIOLENT ones, are with Muslim extremists. Most Muslims go on with their daily lives peacefully, as we do, hoping for peace and order not violence and chaos. Muslims worldwide have derided the extremists, saying their tactics are the antithesis of true Islam.
My point is not about all Muslims strapping on bomb belts, I am referring to those who are "sympathetic to the cause." Those are the real dangers in all this. Also, I think you are taking the extreme opposite side, saying that most Muslims are non-violent. How can you say that when the crux of their religion is steeped in violence and revenge. You obviously know nothing about Islam. Either that or the majority are milk-toasty about their religion so they could care less, while the more zealous ones embrace the more harmful (to others) parts of their religion.

This is still an experiment very much in the early stages. You cannot conclude anything yet.
Now the US military are scientists? LMAO... Funny, I never heard Bush call the conflict this. But... you know better obviously because you post on ET, the President does not.

As for "has anything really changed," the answer of course is ABSOLUTELY. Ask your average Iraqi and he/she is damn grateful to be rid of Saddam and the tyranny that came with it.
Yeah, I'll call up 10 million of 'em right now.... Good suggestion!

You simply cannot compare life under Saddam with the current situation, despite the ongoing (but much smaller scale) violence.
With the millions of rounds of ammo flying through the air since he was captured....? You can surely say it cannot be compared.

Your problem, sadly, is that you hate too much.
I hate too much????? WHAT are you possibly basing that on?????

Oh, nevermind.

PHUCK YOU!!!!! :D

Tribal Sunni Chief Will Lead Iraq Gov't
Until he gets assassinated.
 
Quote from LongShot:

why dont you stick to losing-at-trading..

that's what you do best..

you don't know shite when comes to foreign policy..

so shut up your pie hole looser haha :p
LongShot, you wouldn't talk to your friend... TradeOff like that, now... would you...?
 
Quote from ElCubano:

I agree who in their right mind would want to live under those circumstances ( Saddam in power ); but with that said the country was not in chaos when he ruled with his iron fist...in other words they may not want him in power, but only someone like him may be the only one to keep them in check...get what im saying.....

no iron fist = different tribes trying to rule with iron fist= chaos....
Exactly my point, EC!
 
Quote from Coins:

My point is not about all Muslims strapping on bomb belts, I am referring to those who are "sympathetic to the cause." Those are the real dangers in all this. Also, I think you are taking the extreme opposite side, saying that most Muslims are non-violent. How can you say that when the crux of their religion is steeped in violence and revenge. You obviously know nothing about Islam. Either that or the majority are milk-toasty about their religion so they could care less, while the more zealous ones embrace the more harmful (to others) parts of their religion.

Now the US military are scientists? LMAO... Funny, I never heard Bush call the conflict this. But... you know better obviously because you post on ET, the President does not.

Yeah, I'll call up 10 million of 'em right now.... Good suggestion!

With the millions of rounds of ammo flying through the air since he was captured....? You can surely say it cannot be compared.

I hate too much????? WHAT are you possibly basing that on?????

Oh, nevermind.

PHUCK YOU!!!!! :D
Pity, I thought for a sec you might offer a better argument. Instead, and rather dissappointingly, you are left with nothing but ad hominem attacks and sarcasm. I leave you to your obvious biases, fantasies, and inadequacies.
 
Quote from hapaboy:

Pity, I thought for a sec you might offer a better argument. Instead, and rather dissappointingly, you are left with nothing but ad hominem attacks and sarcasm. I leave you to your obvious biases, fantasies, and inadequacies.
Key event here is you LEAVING me...

Good riddance. Be sure not to come back.
 
Quote from Coins:

This subject has been plaguing me for awhile now.

We have seen how uncivilized and barbaric (I'd love to get an Iraqi chick in bed) Iraqis are since we so graciously removed their brutal tyrant Saddam off of them by the blood of our US soldiers.

What if... Saddam was simply a natural progression of leadership among the nation of Iraq?

What if... it took the likes of a brutal dictator with his primative means of torture and his army of "thugs" to keep these people subdued?

The key what if ... after Bush hands over Iraq to the local people in June, the inner core group of extremely violent Iraqis (who Saddam had subdued during his dictatorship) continue fighting and warring, faction against faction, causing so much civil unrest that the majority of Iraqis clearly see how much better off in comparison they were WITH Saddam in power that they beginning wanting Saddam and his group back in power in order to keep the violent Iraqis in line??

What if Saddam's brutal ways of torture were THE ONLY WAY to deal with and handle this base culture of primative and violent people?

What is going to happen to Bush's plan/campaign then?

What if...you had no friggin idea what you were talking about?
 
Quote from Cutten:

What if...you had no friggin idea what you were talking about?
Then I'd probably post on ET and try to pick up mytwocents.

What about you?
 
Back
Top