My point is not about all Muslims strapping on bomb belts, I am referring to those who are "sympathetic to the cause." Those are the real dangers in all this. Also, I think you are taking the extreme opposite side, saying that most Muslims are non-violent. How can you say that when the crux of their religion is steeped in violence and revenge. You obviously know nothing about Islam. Either that or the majority are milk-toasty about their religion so they could care less, while the more zealous ones embrace the more harmful (to others) parts of their religion.Quote from hapaboy:
Coins, it's amazing how one dimensional your thinking is. You characterize Islam as a whole as being simply a religion of violence and revenge, and refuse to take into consideration that the problems we have, at least the VIOLENT ones, are with Muslim extremists. Most Muslims go on with their daily lives peacefully, as we do, hoping for peace and order not violence and chaos. Muslims worldwide have derided the extremists, saying their tactics are the antithesis of true Islam.
Now the US military are scientists? LMAO... Funny, I never heard Bush call the conflict this. But... you know better obviously because you post on ET, the President does not.This is still an experiment very much in the early stages. You cannot conclude anything yet.
Yeah, I'll call up 10 million of 'em right now.... Good suggestion!As for "has anything really changed," the answer of course is ABSOLUTELY. Ask your average Iraqi and he/she is damn grateful to be rid of Saddam and the tyranny that came with it.
With the millions of rounds of ammo flying through the air since he was captured....? You can surely say it cannot be compared.You simply cannot compare life under Saddam with the current situation, despite the ongoing (but much smaller scale) violence.
I hate too much????? WHAT are you possibly basing that on?????Your problem, sadly, is that you hate too much.
Oh, nevermind.
PHUCK YOU!!!!!

Tribal Sunni Chief Will Lead Iraq Gov't
Until he gets assassinated.