Just want to say I don't disagree that Sig has the right idea about why that isn't a problem. Historically, the USG has suppressed many-a-rebellion. All that means is that rebellions are common. The main question is whether those rebellions lead to a change. And conceptually, it makes sense in a majority-rules democracy like we mostly have in the US.
Maybe 150 years of insurgency training has insight into that?
Maybe 150 years of insurgency training has insight into that?



