US Deploys Truman Carrier Strike Group And 7 Warships With Cruise Missiles To Mediterranean

destriero said:
Truly the only thing in our corner, other than Mattis and Kelly, is our TridentIIs. Our SLBM fleet is an order of mag more advanced. Let's pray it doesn't come to that, or that fuckface Cheeto doesn't mistake the Diet Coke button for...
More...
Nope. We have Mattis, Kelly and MAD. You're right about our SLBM fleet but if it came to all-out nuclear war, Russia's sheer numbers make that irrelevant.
 
Frederick Foresight said:
Sure, bro. As always, you are full of crap and know no middle ground, just like the guy you voted for. Just as with him, it all or nothing; fantastic or terrible. Like him, you want to be an asshole to others yet treated with respect. You deserve each other. Most recently Slartibartfast, but others before him as well, had you pegged even when I erroneously kept trying to give you the benefit of the doubt from time to time. My mistake.
More...

alright, as usual, it's worthless to talk to you. my only mistake was removing you from ignore. I'll fix that now. Shout at me all you want behind the glass, monkey.
 
Poindexter said:
Nope. We have Mattis, Kelly and MAD. You're right about our SLBM fleet but if it came to all-out nuclear war, Russia's sheer numbers make that irrelevant.
More...


Irrelevant to what? Both sides have enough to vaporize every population center in each respective country. Powered-flight to re-entry phase of our Tridents in the Baltics is under 8 minutes.
 
Russia's ground-launched tech, which is the majority of their arsenal like the SR-28, are liquid fuel based and essentially out of service.
 
You know I've never understood that. That would mean their missiles truly are defensive, right? Wouldn't we be able to see them fueling?
 
Tsing Tao said:
alright, as usual, it's worthless to talk to you. my only mistake was removing you from ignore. I'll fix that now. Shout at me all you want behind the glass, monkey.
More...
He's daft!

I was reading an old thread and saw that he actually used that word in this forum. Little did I know when I first read your descriptions (internet lurking fag hag and queen of snark herself) how accurate they really were.
 
Arnie said:
You know I've never understood that. That would mean their missiles truly are defensive, right? Wouldn't we be able to see them fueling?
More...

No, they lacked the tech for solid fuel systems. They leak. They have had silo explosions from sparking of liquid fuels in the boosters. The warheads are hardened.

Putin wants us to remove out THAAD installations in the EU and Asia. THAAD is a viable BM defense between boost/powered flight phase to apogee and perhaps re-entry, but that's only 10% of the system. It is essentially UHR radar that can detect silo activity and their missile sleds (mobile launchers).
 
destriero said:
Irrelevant to what? Both sides have enough to vaporize every population center in each respective country. Powered-flight to re-entry phase of our Tridents in the Baltics is under 8 minutes.
More...
Irrelevant to preventing us from being nuked. Sorry but we absolutely do not have the capability to launch a preemptive nuclear strike against Russia. That's ridiculous.

And we're not getting into a nuclear war with Russia. Crawl back into your lead lined basement and put your tinfoil hat back on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top