US cities see unexplained rise in violent crimes this year

This is not a blip, it's a spike and a large one. There's a reason for that and it's painfully obvious what that reason is. Hint: It ain't that there are suddenly more guns available.
Ok, call it a spike if you wish.

"Chicago, a city long associated with violent crime that plagues its poorer neighborhoods, saw six people fatally shot over the Memorial Day weekend and 56 wounded, ending a bloody month in a bloody year. May's 66 homicides — 19 more than May 2015 and 25 more than May 2014 — raised the total number for the year past the 240 mark. That's more than 50 percent higher than last year, and puts the city on a pace to easily surpass the 500 homicides it saw in 2012."

"19 more... 25 more...", my god it's WW2 out there.
 
Ok, call it a spike if you wish.

"Chicago, a city long associated with violent crime that plagues its poorer neighborhoods, saw six people fatally shot over the Memorial Day weekend and 56 wounded, ending a bloody month in a bloody year. May's 66 homicides — 19 more than May 2015 and 25 more than May 2014 — raised the total number for the year past the 240 mark. That's more than 50 percent higher than last year, and puts the city on a pace to easily surpass the 500 homicides it saw in 2012."

"19 more... 25 more...", my god it's WW2 out there.
And what do all those murderers have in common? They all attended government schools when they were young.
 
Ok, call it a spike if you wish.

"Chicago, a city long associated with violent crime that plagues its poorer neighborhoods, saw six people fatally shot over the Memorial Day weekend and 56 wounded, ending a bloody month in a bloody year. May's 66 homicides — 19 more than May 2015 and 25 more than May 2014 — raised the total number for the year past the 240 mark. That's more than 50 percent higher than last year, and puts the city on a pace to easily surpass the 500 homicides it saw in 2012."

"19 more... 25 more...", my god it's WW2 out there.
I doubt that making light of all these dead people will solve the problem, but it does fall right in line with the typical leftist response to the issue. Ignore, minimize and deny the problem exists, then wring their hands as the bodies pile up.
Frankly it is a combat zone in the poorer sections of Chicago, and it's spilling out into the rest of the city as well. But hey, anything to keep the racial divide in place. Dead Negroes mean votes.
 
I doubt that making light of all these dead people will solve the problem, but it does fall right in line with the typical leftist response
You don't give a shit either, don't pretend you do. You just want someone to blame.
 
You don't give a shit either, don't pretend you do. You just want someone to blame.
You're right, I don't much care what the hood rats do to each other, but the media types, politicians and the like sure do put on the act now don't they? What I want to hear is Hillary and the rest of the leftist crowd say what you just wrote in your last couple posts, which can be summed up nicely by saying, while we pretend to care, the truth is we really don't give a shit about a few hundred dead niggers.
 
You're right, I don't much care what the hood rats do to each other, but the media types, politicians and the like sure do put on the act now don't they? What I want to hear is Hillary and the rest of the leftist crowd say what you just wrote in your last couple posts, which can be summed up nicely by saying, while we pretend to care, the truth is we really don't give a shit about a few hundred dead niggers.
"You're right, I don't much care what the hood rats..." I knew that, and there you go again. The left wants to maintain the social safety net, preserve and expand equality of opportunity, and redistribute wealth from the wealthy to those in need, such as via the ACA. You may disagree with those things, but they are morally superior to your "gun down the f'king thugs".
 
"You're right, I don't much care what the hood rats..." I knew that, and there you go again. The left wants to maintain the social safety net, preserve and expand equality of opportunity, and redistribute wealth from the wealthy to those in need, such as via the ACA. You may disagree with those things, but they are morally superior to your "gun down the f'king thugs".
The social safety net, equal opportunity and affordable health care have nothing to do with the killing fields of the inner city. It they did we wouldn't be seeing the spike in violence. You can continue to deny that glorifying thugs and condemning the cops that kill them isn't a problem, but it is a problem and it's a big problem.
 
1. If the govt is not going to do its job of defending out borders and keeping potential terrorists and criminal out... I am quite thankful the second amendment made gun ownership our constitutional right. Regardless of is some gun owners are dumb.

2. Do you anti gun people really think we can trust Washington D.C. to keep us safe? Can we trust washington d.c. to do was is in the interests of those who finance the campaigns or what is in the interest of the citizens?

Search Results

124 illegal immigrants released from jail later charged in 138 murder ...
www.washingtonexaminer.com/ice-124-illegal-immigrants-freed...jail.../2585720
Mar 14, 2016 - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has revealed that 124 illegal immigrantcriminals released from jail by the Obama administration since 2010 have been subsequently charged with murder. ... "The criminal aliens released by ICE in these years — who had already been convicted ...
ICE: 124 illegal immigrants released from jail later charged ... - Fox News
www.foxnews.com/.../ice-124-illegal-immigrants-released-from-jai...
Fox News Channel
Mar 14, 2016 - "The criminal aliens released by ICE in these years — who had already ..... HTF canObama sleep knowing he let these animals out of jail and ...

Obama Releases 36,000 Dangerous Illegal Aliens from Prison
therighttobear.com/obama-releases-36000-dangerous-illegal-aliens-from-prison/
The center for immigration studies released a report a few days ago that. ... And yes, the Obamaadministration knew about these convictions and let them loose ...
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    3.2 KB · Views: 4
  • upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    4.2 KB · Views: 5
  • upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    3.3 KB · Views: 4
  • upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    3.4 KB · Views: 3
  • upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    upload_2016-6-6_9-45-58.jpeg
    3.9 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
well think about it. If we are going to let millions of illegal aliens just walk across the border do we really want them all armed? No, that would be unsafe for ALL people. So why not outlaw guns? Maybe it won't solve the problem but it's a good start we can all agree on (except a few Bible thumping holdouts in right wing talk radio land.)
 
So, you do not want to back up your claim that cities with stricter gun controls exhibit higher gun related crime rates than cities with less strict gun controls?

I am asking because you made such claim and now this post of yours kind of directly relates.

By the way I don't care about who ensures training and proper education on responsible gun usage. I believe lobby groups and industry associations benefit the pockets of their representative donors and are not motivated by delivering benefits to society. Hence let's not go down this road. It's almost like you laud drug dealers coming to school and educating kids to not share needles. Industry organizations that promote fair use of objects designed to kill rightly should have no place in school.

I hope you are aware what organization used to provide most of the gun education and training in the U.S. - it is the NRA.

When I went to K-12 public school NRA instruction was mandatory for all students. In elementary school they had the Eddie Eagle series and by high school you were shooting in gym class. Our high school in suburban Nassau County next to New York City had a rifle range. Our school had both a riflery team and archery team. Every day student brought their 22 rifles and bows to school and put them in lockers. We competed against other schools with similar facilities. We never had shootings in our school despite students bringing guns to school each day with the districts permission.

Who sponsored and provided all this training you ask -- the NRA.

Sadly these days are gone and in our politically correct era schools no longer have these programs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top