Under pressure from the white house, Mccabe fired hours from retirement.

Mueller's team interviewed McCabe, asked about Comey's firing
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/17/politics/mccabe-memos-trump/index.html

Special counsel Robert Mueller's team interviewed former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and asked about the firing of FBI Director James Comey, a source briefed on the matter confirmed to CNN.

The source would not say when the interview, first reported by Axios, occurred.

Mueller also has memos written by McCabe documenting his conversations with President Donald Trump, a person familiar with the matter told CNN.

The memos also detail what Comey told McCabe about his own interactions with Trump while he was FBI director, the source said, and are seen as a way to corroborate Comey's account in Mueller's probe on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The Associated Press first reported on the existence of the memos and that the special counsel's office has them.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired McCabe on Friday night, just over 24 hours before his 50th birthday and the date he was set to retire and begin receiving his anticipated pension, over accusations that McCabe directed FBI officials to speak to the media about an investigation tied to the Clinton Foundation and misled investigators about his actions.

Following his firing Friday, McCabe told CNN in an interview that he had four interactions with the President last May, while he was acting FBI director.

McCabe revealed that he had three in-person interactions and one phone call with Trump, in which the President berated him each time about his wife's failed Virginia Senate campaign.

It is unclear exactly what is in McCabe's memos and if he memorialized every interaction he had with the President. McCabe did not keep a copy of his memos after turning them over to Mueller, the source confirmed. A spokesman for the special counsel's office declined comment.

"In May, when Director Comey was fired and I had my own interactions with the President, he brought up my wife every time I ever spoke to him," McCabe told CNN. "Of course, I disagreed with him."

McCabe also confirmed that the President asked him who he voted for in the 2016 election, which was reported back in January and which Trump denied.

The former No. 2 official at the FBI told CNN that Trump did not bring up the agency's investigation into Russia meddling in the 2016 election.

Comey's memos

Comey revealed last year that he had kept memos while he was still FBI director about meetings and conversations he had with the President. Comey said his memos detailed conversations in which Trump asked Comey to pledge loyalty to him, state publicly that the FBI was not investigating Trump himself, and urged Comey to "let this go," referring to the then-investigation involving Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Trump has denied several of Comey's claims.

During his testimony on Capitol Hill last June, Comey acknowledged orchestrating the leak of his memos to the media a few days after he was fired in hopes that the Justice Department would appoint a special counsel.

The former FBI director's memos have also been handed over to the special counsel.


The IG is also sitting there with a full set of McCabe's emails that the court has ordered that he turn over to Judicial Watch but the IG is refusing to do so because they are part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

Mueller might be looking for something in the notes to give him a lead but he is not going to be calling McCabe as a witness any time soon.

It could also backfire on Mueller because we know that he is looking to bag Trump and not just to find the truth. Since the existence of those notes is known, Trump's team is entitled to see them if he is charged or even as part of the plea dealing. If McCabe's notes don't record anything related to attempts to obstruct- other than Comey restating that just seeing the president made him uneasy- then that is exculpatory evidence that will work in Trumps favor.

Comey needs to watch his arse. You know the law and departmental rules require all FBI employees to report any attempts to influence their conduct or a case to their superiors or to the IG. Comey testified to Congress that he was uneasy about seeing Trump but did not think he was trying to influence him. Later, after he was fired, he started saying he thought he was trying to obstruct his investigation at that meeting. There is an appearance that Comey did not report Trumps attempts to influence his investigation as long as he thought his job was still there. Or that he did not think that he was influencing him until he was fired, then it became convenient to think that. Which is it Jim? A jury would want to know.
 
Looks like the Democrats in Congress are about to undermine Trump and Sessions on this...

Democratic Congressman offers McCabe a two day long job so he can get his pension
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news...red-fbi-deputy-director-mccabe-job/435178002/


The Justice Department fulfilled its responsibility to move out a bad actor as soon as they could deal with the recommendations from their inspector general. If other clowns want to put together a go fund me page to get him his early retirement then they are free to do that. I will say again that I still think he is good to go on the full retirement at 57, it is just the early bird special thing that is at risk.

It is important that McCabe leave the FBI as a fired and disgraced person to make a statement and get him out of there. As I said, others can do whatever they want to help him, but when the additional stuff about McCabe comes out there would have been a firestorm of protest as to why lazy boy sessions and the FBI protect-your-own types just let him just run out the clock. They will not take heat on that now. They did what they could to expose him and move him out.

McCabe and others need to be careful about getting too cute and giving the Justice Department the finger and taunting them and calling the Inspector General a witch hunter. They can fully muellerize him at a moments notice, go over to his house in the middle of the night, put the cuffs on him, and indict him for any number of crimes. He might get his full pension but then spend a few hundred thousand on lawyers fees just as muellers victims are going through. Neither Mueller nor McCabe can get their jobs and their reputations back at this point. Comey may do well with his book deal, and McCabe may get his retirement but they are both busted down people now compared to where they would have been. And there is much, much, much more evidence of their wrongdoing still to come.
 
Last edited:
They don't do background checks as we know.


trump_aide_resigns-copy.jpg
 

This is the storyline where the right is failing. McCabe pushed the Clinton investigation and most likely unethically released info on her to the press to keep the investigation going, and that is what ultimately got him in a bind with OPR.

The same thing happened with Comey.


As I’m reading some of these comments it’s hard to believe how you guys are completely manipulated by right wing media. Nothing you guys are saying makes any sense.

You would benefit from reading McCabe’s statement.
 
Last edited:
I don't believe (based on current news reports) that the Inspector General has anything on McCabe that rises to a level of a fireable offense. I expect that upcoming information put out into the media (via court filings, etc.) will support this assertion.

If the I.G. did have evidence that McCabe did take objectionable actions rising to a level requiring termination then I would expect the following:
  1. The objectionable actions are clearly outlined in the termination announcement like they are for other FBI agents.
  2. The announcement included a statement from the I.G. Office of Professional Responsibility supporting the termination.
  3. That criminal charges or criminal referral were announced around the time of the termination.
Since none of the above happened, any reasonable person can only assume this is a political witch hunt -- especially when Sessions makes the announcement at 10pm on Friday night -- hours before McCabe's retirement.

I would be the first person who would want McCabe locked up for a lengthy prison sentence (and fired) if they had proof that he did something wrong. The problem is that they have no proof or weak proof. Proof so minor that they can't even find anything appropriate to include in the firing announcement.

McCabes firing seems politically motivated to me because of the timing. Going after his pension is petty and to recommend his firing without a full report is suspicious because it doesn’t show any context for the findings.

I will reserve full judgment on this until the report is released but how this rolled out is fishy.
 
McCabes firing seems politically motivated to me because of the timing. Going after his pension is petty and to recommend his firing without a full report is suspicious because it doesn’t show any context for the findings.

I will reserve full judgment on this until the report is released but how this rolled out is fishy.


How do you conclude that the IG did not make a full report of findings sufficient for firing simply because his findings for other misconduct is still ongoing?

They could shit-can page and strzok tomorrow on known facts, although the full report on them is still ongoing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top