U.S. markets should be set to soar when they open.

El Guapo · Oct 30, 2012

Ayn Coulter and Rachel Maddow or
Ayn Coulter and Jennifer Granholm Or
Jennifer Granholm and Rachel Maddow.

It's a lobsta; either way.

Quote from Ricter:

Max, you're a retard*.

* The author wishes to thank the ball-draining attention whore Ayn Coulter for provision of this discourse changing term.

tradingjournals · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from Ricter:

Max, you're a retard*.

* The author wishes to thank the ball-draining attention whore Ayn Coulter for provision of this discourse changing term.

Intercourse or discourse?

tradingjournals · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from pspr:

We need to use a neutron bomb that just removes the varmints (the people) and leaves the state in tact.

Neutron bombs and ballistic missiles are too dangerous to be left in the hands of land hungry crazies.

Wiki says: "Jericho is a general designation given to the Israeli ballistic missiles."

bigarrow · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from Ricter:

Max, you're a retard*.

Yes he's in a constant battle with pspr for the dumbest poster on this site, hence the constant stream of new brainless threads by the both of them...they're in a race.

Epic · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from Ricter:

You're so far off track it's laughable. A Randian purist, virtually alone in the world.

I'd be interested in hearing your rebuttal of the simplistic video. Where specifically is it so far off track?

Lucrum · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from Epic:

I'd be interested in hearing your rebuttal of the simplistic video. Where specifically is it so far off track?

Ricter retard doesn't do rebuttals. He does occasional answer questions with his version of a riddle, of sorts.

Ricter · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from Epic:

I'd be interested in hearing your rebuttal of the simplistic video. Where specifically is it so far off track?

Lol, I don't watch his videos. What is it, an explanation of the broken window fallacy? Who cares? Government spending is not going to crowd out private sector spending at this time, there is no opportunity cost.

Edit: but, my "off track" comment was not directed at the video, but as his relentless criticism of fiscal policy during a time when it's most perfectly suited and would have maximum effect.

Epic · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from Ricter:

Lol, I don't watch his videos. What is it, an explanation of the broken window fallacy? Who cares? Government spending is not going to crowd out private sector spending at this time, there is no opportunity cost.

Well, not exactly. The argument isn't that government spending crowds out private spending. The argument also doesn't have much to do with opportunity cost. In economic terms it deals with dead weight loss. DWL is pretty much irrefutable and both sides agree that it exists. The debate is not over whether or not there is DWL, but rather whether it is acceptable.

pspr · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from Max E. Pad:

No, im not the one with Krugman riding reverse cowboy on my face.

If a broken window is good for the economy a bunch of broken cities via Sandy should be uber stimulative right?

Here ill try to keep this simple for you.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FMcGTZ6Mc_c?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Your video puts it in such simple language you would think even a liberal or communist could understand it. But not Ricter. He can only think in collective farm terms these days.

Lucrum · Oct 30, 2012

Quote from pspr:

Your video puts it in such simple language you would think even a liberal or communist could understand it. But not Ricter. He can only think in collective farm terms these days.

+ 3