Trump itching to fire the fed

CaptainObvious said:
Yes, I know and knew that. When the left puts up someone besides a criminal, politically corrupt, business as usual hack there may be a choice to be made. Until then, enjoy the show and the double standards and hypocrisy from the left.
More...
don't blame your ignorance on others, you got conned and, are just realizing it.
 
RedDuke said:
Nada zilch, right just refuses to acknowledge the simple fact, that Clinton was not indicted because there was nothing to be indicted for.

This is were super rich have an upper hand, no matter the party. There are many prosecutors out there that would indict a poor/middle class person to put a check on their resume, legal fight can cost 100 of thousands to millions, how many can afford it???

There must be clear evidence of wrong doing to indict someone like Clinton, and there is non of course.
More...

I agree that there isn't enough evidence to indict her. But if the law had spent the same amount of time and resources in an exhaustive review of Clinton like they did with Trump, then I'd bet they would have found something. A lot of somethings. But that is just my opinion, I do not have evidence of that.
 
Tsing Tao said:
I agree that there isn't enough evidence to indict her. But if the law had spent the same amount of time and resources in an exhaustive review of Clinton like they did with Trump, then I'd bet they would have found something. A lot of somethings. But that is just my opinion, I do not have evidence of that.
More...

She has been scrutinized for over 30 years, I think it is long enough, and still zilch.
 
RedDuke said:
She has been scrutinized for over 30 years, I think it is long enough, and still zilch.
More...

Has she? I wasn't aware a special counsel had been put together to investigate her for anything. Happy to admit I am wrong if I missed something.
 
Tsing Tao said:
Has she? I wasn't aware a special counsel had been put together to investigate her for anything. Happy to admit I am wrong if I missed something.
More...

No special counseling, because she did not fire FBI director and etc....
 
piezoe said:
You've based your opinion of the "left's" candidate on intentional dis-information, though you may not have realized it at the time. Now, however, there is simply no excuse for not realizing this. And curiously, your impression of the "left's" candidate was similar to your impression of the "right's"! You regarded both as criminals. You've led us to believe that you chose what in your mind was the Mob Boss over the "politically corrupt, business as usual hack"! It might be time to just admit you made a mistake. We all do from time to time.

I wasn't thrilled about Hillary's candidacy, I opposed it actually. But in the end I recognized that she was a capable administrator, just missing some of the attributes I would have preferred in our president. Her opponent, as you pointed out, and recognized before the election, was a gangster! And one with severe personality disorders at that! I reluctantly voted for Hillary. We both wish we'd have been given more attractive choices.

I'll admit I had a little advantage. I'm old enough to be very familiar with Hillary's entire public life history from the days before social media, dis-information campaigns. So knowing what the real facts are, I wasn't susceptible to the massive dis-information attack aimed at her. I knew of every charge of illegal and illicit activity that had been hurled at her by her political enemies over the years. None of them proved out after in depth investigations. Only one scandal could rightly be laid at her feet, that was "travelgate." That did not involve illegalities that one could be prosecuted for, but pettiness and meanness on her part. It was one of the reasons I did not want her to be my president.

You can say, and probably will, "what about receiving classified documents on her personal server?" To that, I would say that I posted very early on here on ET that she would never be prosecuted for this. (If I recall, my exact words were "highly unlikely.") Not because of her station or political connections, but because any transgressions of the official rules or the statutory law would be shown to be trivial, and without intent. Throughout our government bureaucracy this type looseness with regard to handling the lowest level of classified documents is nearly always treated with a "slap on the hand." (I myself have had "Q" clearances, and am familiar with the proper handling of classified documents.) Exhaustive investigation showed only a handful of lowest level communications were transmitted to her unsecured server. The fault would have been more with the transmitter than the receiver. No harm and no intent was demonstrated, only bad judgement. Of course this is a charge that will never die, and now, after the fact, there is a push to classify many more of the formerly unclassified documents found on the server! Fault now lies with those doing this dirty work, not with Hillary.
More...
Given the alternative was Hillary I have no regret supporting Trump, disappointment yes, regret, no. He has failed to be the great "dealmaker" that he boasts about. His incessant tweeting has become tedious. I don't care for some of his foreign policy moves of late. And I just tired of listening to him say what a great fucking guy he is day in, day out. Give it a rest asshole.
All that said, if the left continues with this totally unconstitutional, completely illegal impeachment charade, I will have to support him again just based on principle. As of this moment in time the left is a far greater threat to our nation than Trump will ever be, and changing my mind on that will be no easy task considering just how far off the reservation leftist politics and policy has gone.
 
CaptainObvious said:
Given the alternative was Hillary I have no regret supporting Trump, disappointment yes, regret, no. He has failed to be the great "dealmaker" that he boasts about. His incessant tweeting has become tedious. I don't care for some of his foreign policy moves of late. And I just tired of listening to him say what a great fucking guy he is day in, day out. Give it a rest asshole.
All that said, if the left continues with this totally unconstitutional, completely illegal impeachment charade, I will have to support him again just based on principle. As of this moment in time the left is a far greater threat to our nation than Trump will ever be, and changing my mind on that will be no easy task considering just how far off the reservation leftist politics and policy has gone.
More...

Very sad reality indeed.
 
RedDuke said:
Very sad reality indeed.
More...
Don't quite know how to take that given our somewhat testy history, but yes, it is kind of sad. We all should be able to have some fluidity in our politics, and that's become extremely difficult to do. I think that's do to the, are you really going to sit there and judge my choice and your guy has a ton of shit in his game thought process.(comment not directed at you specifically).
It's like when Bill Clinton went through his drama. It was the era of the moral majority. Newt is cheating on his wife, one "man of God" after another is getting "massages" and screwing around and they're going to pass judgment on Clinton? Yeah, he lied about it. No shit, what guy isn't going to lie about that? He sullied the Oval Office. Hey, if I'm prez and can get a BJ in the Oval I'm dropping trou. Isn't anyone coming clean on that until the bitter end. So his supporters got pissed and took the position, screw you all, I don't care what my guy does from here on out, yours are no better. Fast forward through all the subsequent years, each party completely full of shit and disingenuous to the max, and here we are with Trump. People supporting Trump are now in the same mindset, you assholes are going to judge my guy? Really, I mean really? And now it's just a middle finger to everyone. Yeah, my guy is dirty as hell, soon as you come up with one that isn't, or at least isn't a fucking lunatic I'll take notice. Until then...well, we know where we're at. Again, I'm not directing this specifically at you, just a broad generalization of politics as I see it today, and yes, it's sad as hell.
 
CaptainObvious said:
Don't quite know how to take that given our somewhat testy history, but yes, it is kind of sad. We all should be able to have some fluidity in our politics, and that's become extremely difficult to do. I think that's do to the, are you really going to sit there and judge my choice and your guy has a ton of shit in his game thought process.(comment not directed at you specifically).
It's like when Bill Clinton went through his drama. It was the era of the moral majority. Newt is cheating on his wife, one "man of God" after another is getting "massages" and screwing around and they're going to pass judgment on Clinton? Yeah, he lied about it. No shit, what guy isn't going to lie about that? He sullied the Oval Office. Hey, if I'm prez and can get a BJ in the Oval I'm dropping trou. Isn't anyone coming clean on that until the bitter end. So his supporters got pissed and took the position, screw you all, I don't care what my guy does from here on out, yours are no better. Fast forward through all the subsequent years, each party completely full of shit and disingenuous to the max, and here we are with Trump. People supporting Trump are now in the same mindset, you assholes are going to judge my guy? Really, I mean really? And now it's just a middle finger to everyone. Yeah, my guy is dirty as hell, soon as you come up with one that isn't, or at least isn't a fucking lunatic I'll take notice. Until then...well, we know where we're at. Again, I'm not directing this specifically at you, just a broad generalization of politics as I see it today, and yes, it's sad as hell.
More...

All of the above makes sense, and I happen to agree. What happened??? You used to post in a very different manner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top