You left out the part about voting for him.
This just in. He was always this way. If you had even a passing familiarity with his "business" history, you would know this to be true.
Trump itching to fire the fed
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
This just in. He was always this way. If you had even a passing familiarity with his "business" history, you would know this to be true.
Yes, I know and knew that. When the left puts up someone besides a criminal, politically corrupt, business as usual hack there may be a choice to be made. Until then, enjoy the show and the double standards and hypocrisy from the left.
And what has become of the countless Clinton investigations and hearings? Every single one of them? Sorry, there is no excuse for your having voted for a mob boss.
Yawn, the Clinton Cartel is a criminal enterprise, Epstein was murdered, O.J. was guilty, and the sun rises in the east... and Trump is no worse or better than any other political hack in that town. Deliver better, you have my attention. Deliver a different face playing the same old game, why change now?
Nada zilch, right just refuses to acknowledge the simple fact, that Clinton was not indicted because there was nothing to be indicted for.
This is were super rich have an upper hand, no matter the party. There are many prosecutors out there that would indict a poor/middle class person to put a check on their resume, legal fight can cost 100 of thousands to millions, how many can afford it???
There must be clear evidence of wrong doing to indict someone like Clinton, and there is non of course.
And not for a lack of trying on the part of their political opponents.
Last edited:
You've based your opinion of the "left's" candidate on intentional dis-information, though you may not have realized it at the time. Now, however, there is simply no excuse for not realizing this. And curiously, your impression of the "left's" candidate was similar to your impression of the "right's"! You regarded both as criminals. You've led us to believe that you chose what in your mind was the Mob Boss over the "politically corrupt, business as usual hack"! It might be time to just admit you made a mistake. We all do from time to time.
I wasn't thrilled about Hillary's candidacy, I opposed it actually. But in the end I recognized that she was a capable administrator, just missing some of the attributes I would have preferred in our president. Her opponent, as you pointed out, and recognized before the election, was a gangster! And one with severe personality disorders at that! I reluctantly voted for Hillary. We both wish we'd have been given more attractive choices.
I'll admit I had a little advantage. I'm old enough to be very familiar with Hillary's entire public life history from the days before social media, dis-information campaigns. So knowing what the real facts are, I wasn't susceptible to the massive dis-information attack aimed at her. I knew of every charge of illegal and illicit activity that had been hurled at her by her political enemies over the years. None of them proved out after in depth investigations. Only one scandal could rightly be laid at her feet, that was "travelgate." That did not involve illegalities that one could be prosecuted for, but pettiness and meanness on her part. It was one of the reasons I did not want her to be my president.
You can say, and probably will, "what about receiving classified documents on her personal server?" To that, I would say that I posted very early on here on ET that she would never be prosecuted for this. (If I recall, my exact words were "highly unlikely.") Not because of her station or political connections, but because any transgressions of the official rules or the statutory law would be shown to be trivial, and without intent. Throughout our government bureaucracy this type looseness with regard to handling the lowest level of classified documents is nearly always treated with a "slap on the hand." (I myself have had "Q" clearances, and am familiar with the proper handling of classified documents.) Exhaustive investigation showed only a handful of lowest level communications were transmitted to her unsecured server. The fault would have been more with the transmitter than the receiver. No harm and no intent was demonstrated, only bad judgement. Of course this is a charge that will never die, and now, after the fact, there is a push to classify many more of the formerly unclassified documents found on the server! Fault now lies with those doing this dirty work, not with Hillary.
Last edited:
