Trump Adopts AAA Immigration Policy: No More Muslims

Evidently, you do. Because you made an awkward attempt to justify the wording. And it wasn't a typo. It was a "thinko."

Was this also a typo?

LMFAO!

You actually wasted time to scan through my old posts to prove some meaningless pissing contest? Here let me help you out, I'll be the first to acknowledge that there are usually numerous grammatical errors in my posts, improper sentence structure, misspelled words, misplaced commas/periods, and Yes! missing contractions .... my time is too precious to go to the trouble of proofing trivial responses in a P&R forum.

But regardless of any grammatical blunders the context of this message is "crystal clear", Dude, you're a "Loser."
 
Here let me help you out, I'll be the first to acknowledge that there are usually numerous grammatical errors in my posts, improper sentence structure, misspelled words, misplaced commas/periods, and Yes! missing contractions .... my time is too precious to go to the trouble of proofing trivial responses in a P&R forum.
I think I understand. Your time is too precious to put any thought into your posts, and it has nothing to do with your underlying ignorance.
 
I guess the first 100,000 have not been a problem...

DANGER ALREADY HERE? Syrian immigration tops 100,000 since 2012
A PROPOSAL TO ADMIT 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States has ignited a bitter debate in Washington, but more than 10 times that number of people from the embattled country have quietly come to America since 2012.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/1...ation-quietly-tops-100000-since/?intcmp=hpbt1

Odumbo has been "ushering in" Muslims into the US all along.... all parts of his plan to destroy America and turn our country into an Islamic Caliphate...'cause that's just WHO HE IS!!

As we count down to the end of his presidential term, expect MORE of such actions.

Odumbo has NEVER acted as America's president... but has always acted as America's enemy!

WAKE UP, AMERICA!!

:(
 
Last edited:
I wonder how this will go down with the Trumpsters:

34-nation ‘Islamic military alliance’ to fight terrorism, Saudi Arabia says

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...-terrorism-saudi-arabia-says/article27754964/

CNN - Saudi coalition? Don't get too excited
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/17/opinions/miller-saudi-arabia-coalition/index.html
  • Newly announced Arab coalition unlikely to have any impact against ISIS
  • Saudi Arabia is more concerned about Iran
The announcement this week that Saudi Arabia has organized a military coalition to fight the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria might be taken seriously if the Arab and Muslim states participating had any kind of track record that demonstrated coherence, single-minded purpose or resolve in addressing any of the challenges that have confronted their broken, angry and dysfunctional region.

Unfortunately, that is not the case.

True, there have been collective organizations, alignments and coalitions before -- the still active, 70-year-old Arab League, the now-extinct United Arab Republic (Syria and Egypt), the Organization of the Islamic Conference and the somewhat more functional and modern Gulf Cooperation Council.

But forgive me if I remain skeptical, because the reality is that this coalition of the unwilling, dysfunctional and self-interested is unlikely to make much of a difference either on the battlefield or in the politics of the anti-ISIS struggle. Indeed, if Arab and Muslim states really wanted to do something useful, they would take on the task of religiously and politically delegitimizing their own extremists and radical jihadis at home and in the region.

The Saudi foreign minister, a guy who is surely too smart to believe his own talking points, actually asserted that "confronting the ideology of extremism" would be a goal.


(More at above url)
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


I suppose when your idea contradicts the first 10 words of the Bill of Rights, you have likely put forward a stupid idea.
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


I suppose when your idea contradicts the first 10 words of the Bill of Rights, you have likely put forward a stupid idea.
The Bill of Rights applies to persons "inside"our borders, (it's debatable if non-citizens are given full rights) but it's never been the case to give "carte blanche access" to anyone seeking entrance. We determine who can come in and who gets the door slammed in their face.

Immigration is a matter of Administrative not Criminal Law. Congress has full control.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top