Evidently, you do. Because you made an awkward attempt to justify the wording. And it wasn't a typo. It was a "thinko."
Was this also a typo?
I think I understand. Your time is too precious to put any thought into your posts, and it has nothing to do with your underlying ignorance.Here let me help you out, I'll be the first to acknowledge that there are usually numerous grammatical errors in my posts, improper sentence structure, misspelled words, misplaced commas/periods, and Yes! missing contractions .... my time is too precious to go to the trouble of proofing trivial responses in a P&R forum.
I guess the first 100,000 have not been a problem...
DANGER ALREADY HERE? Syrian immigration tops 100,000 since 2012
A PROPOSAL TO ADMIT 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States has ignited a bitter debate in Washington, but more than 10 times that number of people from the embattled country have quietly come to America since 2012.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/1...ation-quietly-tops-100000-since/?intcmp=hpbt1
I wonder how this will go down with the Trumpsters:
34-nation ‘Islamic military alliance’ to fight terrorism, Saudi Arabia says
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...-terrorism-saudi-arabia-says/article27754964/
Words to live by.Don't get too excited
The Bill of Rights applies to persons "inside"our borders, (it's debatable if non-citizens are given full rights) but it's never been the case to give "carte blanche access" to anyone seeking entrance. We determine who can come in and who gets the door slammed in their face.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I suppose when your idea contradicts the first 10 words of the Bill of Rights, you have likely put forward a stupid idea.