Do you really think propaganda from a right wing think tank is the same as real science? You must be very gullible.
Think the past winter was bad? Get ready for mini Ice Age
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
Do you really think propaganda from a right wing think tank is the same as real science? You must be very gullible.
Maybe you missed this..
and the NIPCC is nothing more than propaganda from the Heartland Institute.
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2...dibility-test/
and the NIPCC is nothing more than propaganda from the Heartland Institute.
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2...dibility-test/
Do you really think propaganda from the IPCC is the same as real science? You must be very gullible.
Your link is broken doofus. Let me help you out. Here's what you were trying to post:
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2013/09/09/heartland-institute-nipcc-fail-the-credibility-test/
From some of the comments, looks like the "critique" is nothing more than inept left wing propaganda.
The NIPCC further rips your hit piece here, which was WRITTEN BY AN AUTHOR OF CHILDREN'S BOOKS:
Reply to ClimateScienceWatch.com, âHeartland Institute and its NIPCC report fail the credibility test,â September 9, 2013
This anonymously written criticism of NIPCC and Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science appeared on the anti-skeptic Web site ClimateScienceWatch.org and originally appeared on a blog run by Jeff Nesbit, an author of childrenâs novels. The authorâs lack of a scientific background is apparent in this review. There are many points in this article that require correction.
Continued at: http://climatechangereconsidered.or...t-fail-the-credibility-test-september-9-2013/
Actually the IPCC is generally the world's most authoritative comprehensive source of climate information that the world has.
But if you think they are not then I see your problem. You are deluded by right wing propaganda. Like the kind you posted.
So you still think something from a right wing think tank about GW is NOT propaganda? Really? Are you really THAT stupid?
Your link is broken doofus. Let me help you out. Here's what you were trying to post:
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2013/09/09/heartland-institute-nipcc-fail-the-credibility-test/
From some of the comments, looks like the "critique" is nothing more than inept left wing propaganda.
The NIPCC further rips your hit piece here, which was WRITTEN BY AN AUTHOR OF CHILDREN'S BOOKS:
Reply to ClimateScienceWatch.com, âHeartland Institute and its NIPCC report fail the credibility test,â September 9, 2013
This anonymously written criticism of NIPCC and Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science appeared on the anti-skeptic Web site ClimateScienceWatch.org and originally appeared on a blog run by Jeff Nesbit, an author of childrenâs novels. The authorâs lack of a scientific background is apparent in this review. There are many points in this article that require correction.
Continued at: http://climatechangereconsidered.or...t-fail-the-credibility-test-september-9-2013/
You automatically label any report full of scientific facts and figures that is skeptical of AGW as right-wing propaganda. Amusing. Are all the leading scientists who submitted information to the NIPCC report merely to be labeled as 'deniers' and discarded including the Nobel prize winners.
I guess you are not aware that the NIPCC is a construction of the Heartland Institute........a conservative "think" tank.
Pure propaganda. The IPCC is the best source of real science. Maybe you go to known propaganda outlets for your science. I do not.
Not to mention that the report is full of errors and written by who?