The west should expect a massive influx of HK refugees

Sorry 1997, I was actually in an episode of TV cop show filmed there in 1996, brain fart.

Nothing to do with the lease? Are you fucking slow today also? The only reason for the agreement was the lease's clock running out.

History by googling some snippet.. I lived in the Irish/UK relm all this time period. It was not stuff people in the States had much to any attention on, big deal in the UK.

Everyone understood when the lease expired the clock was ticking. Agreements become nothing once they can't be enforced.

China has to somewhat behave the world is it's customer but they won't get any pushback from an increasingly gaslit population. Bad is good, 2+2=5 westerners. I'd strangle Bannon for what he had done.

Just to make the point again.... the current situation in Hong Kong today is governed by the 1985 Sino-British joint declaration it is not governed in any manner by a lease. The U.K. is allowing Hong Kong residents to enter the U.K. because China violated the terms of the 1985 Sino-British joint declaration; not because China violated a lease.
 
Just to make the point again.... the current situation in Hong Kong today is governed by the 1985 Sino-British joint declaration it is not governed in any manner by a lease. The U.K. is allowing Hong Kong residents to enter the U.K. because China violated the terms of the 1985 Sino-British joint declaration; not because China violated a lease.

You really are an igit.

You said they "gave" HK to China.

They negotiated the agreement with the stick of refusing honor the lease end and shit getting messy.
 
Last edited:
Just to make the point again.... the current situation in Hong Kong today is governed by the 1985 Sino-British joint declaration it is not governed in any manner by a lease. The U.K. is allowing Hong Kong residents to enter the U.K. because China violated the terms of the 1985 Sino-British joint declaration; not because China violated a lease.


The declaration was forced into being because the lease was running out.....rather than just give back part of the territories and separate out parts of Hong Kong area, Britian decided to give it all back.

Needless to say that the British were quite racist to the locals who were born and raised there and ethnically were of that land rather than colonial overloads. It ranks up there with South Africa as a way long overdue vestige of colonialism that the effects still linger....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top