the sooner we get away from BEEF

[killthesunshine]

A diet that is rich in methionine, an amino acid found in HIGH levels in FISH, RED MEAT, and DAIRY products, may increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, according to researchers at Temple University. The research findings were published in the journal Current Alzheimer Research.

http://www.physorg.com/news180169180.html

once again MEAT is in the news and not in a good way

BETTER TO "FORGET" THE MEAT

 

[R. Raskolnikov]

AGAIN...there is that "MAY" word again.


Do your "scientists" do anything OTHER than hedge themselves?

Quote from killthesunshine:

A diet that is rich in methionine, an amino acid found in HIGH levels in FISH, RED MEAT, and DAIRY products, may increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, according to researchers at Temple University. The research findings were published in the journal Current Alzheimer Research.

http://www.physorg.com/news180169180.html

once again MEAT is in the news and not in a good way

BETTER TO "FORGET" THE MEAT

 

[killthesunshine]

Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

AGAIN...there is that "MAY" word again.


Do your "scientists" do anything OTHER than hedge themselves?

If scientists started in speak in absolutes like your 'paleo' low carb amateur websites, then i would get worried

 

[R. Raskolnikov]

Ah, so what you are saying is that your "cult like" ideas about meat being bad MAY be wrong

Thanks for clarifying!

Quote from killthesunshine:

If scientists started in speak in absolutes like your 'paleo' low carb amateur websites, then i would get worried

 

[killthesunshine]

Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

Ah, so what you are saying is that your "cult like" ideas about meat being bad MAY be wrong

Thanks for clarifying!

No, not at all. The preponderance of evidence weighs heavily against MEAT.

 

[R. Raskolnikov]

Your logic is flawed, you speak in absolute terms (meat is BAD!) but then you say that if a scientist did, you'd be worried!

Which is it?

Quote from killthesunshine:

No, not at all. The preponderance of evidence weighs heavily against MEAT.

"If scientists started in speak in absolutes like your 'paleo' low carb amateur websites, then i would get worried"

 

[killthesunshine]

Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

Your logic is flawed, you speak in absolute terms (meat is BAD!) but then you say that if a scientist did, you'd be worried!

Which is it?

No, you have it wrong. Medical orthodoxy DOES say meat is bad for you and that it should be greatly restricted or eliminated.

MEAT, IT DOES A BODY (AND BRAIN) BAD!

 

[R. Raskolnikov]

Oh I see, when an "absolute" statement is IN LINE with your BIAS then it's ok. But when its against you, then it "has you worried" that they are FOS.

How convenient that must be for you

Quote from killthesunshine:

No, you have it wrong. Medical orthodoxy DOES say meat is bad for you and that it should be greatly restricted or eliminated.

 

[FredBloggs]

Quote from killthesunshine:

the better we'll all feel

*I* am a VEGETARIAN, proud of it!

I am screaming it to the world..

I AM A VEGETARIAN!@!!!!!!

I'M PROUD OF IT!

i gave beef the boot

are you gay?

 

[killthesunshine]

Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

Oh I see, when an "absolute" statement is IN LINE with your BIAS then it's ok. But when its against you, then it "has you worried" that they are FOS.

How convenient that must be for you

Assertion made with confidence should only be made in company of good evidence. The greater the evidence the more weight that can be ascribed to the assertion.