Quote from Vienna:
Ok, That says plenty about your aspirations and skill level if you think that 4% or whatever it was (about equal to inflation) is an achievement.
That was obviously not the point. Please reread
My point stands: you have NO qualification whatsoever, as far a I can see.
Well if you think Hershey and Prof can trade, then I guess it confirms it. Jack is weaseling out, again. Prof has plenty of past ET testimonials that he backs out of contests he himself propsoed.
But at one point you tried to hawk a service, and it seems you express aspiration to do so again
Again, reread. Show WHERE I tried to hawk a service. Nothing beyond exploratory work was ever done. As I said, I created machinery for plausible service, but instead used the C2 site for testing some possible trade methods using supp/res.....
"I may do something for a service in the future, but that is my choosing, not others"..
but I have not seen anything that shows me a craft or a skill.
These are your words. This would be similar to my saying "you didn't post broker statements" when you didn't offer to do so.
And I certainly haven't seen signs of YOUR craft or skill. And I certainly didn't ask for yours.
All you have done is- unwittingly- shown that for you, TA does not work.
This is a fabricated idea. I have already posted links to studies, and there are volumes more studies out there that paint TA as mostly a colossal waste of time. Little has surfaced to disprove this since. Are you ready to show the sheer power of TA? Otherwise, stop babbling.
Your Quantum rambling can also, therefore be ignored. However, I am quite familiar with quantum physics, and research on it and quantum computing (eg, qbits, IBM and other institutional efforts) is something I keep up on.
If you want to make points, then first you should try to establish a credible basis before droning on. Little you said above had much meaning, but there were lots of big words. Try Excedrin if it caused head pain...