St. Louis Riots Follow Common Script

Why bother? When it gets to the point where you have no response, which comes rather quickly, you call me a homosexual commie fag and veer off into another one of your rants. You're a waste of time. When you begin to show an improved clarity in thinking, I might respond again.
He's enjoys playing stupid, ala "who said what? Who, me?" etc., then posing as aggrieved when he doesn't get the answer he expects, when he expects.

Child in a man's body.
 
He enjoys playing stupid, ala "who said what? Who, me?" etc., then posing as aggrieved when he doesn't get the answer he expects, when he expects.

Child in a man's body.

And one who doesn't know how to do a search, which I find funny.

No purpose is served by arguing with defective people. They do a good enough job of making each other feel better, so why not just leave them be? They're all relics and don't know it yet.
 
The OP.
"...My question is why does the "community" erupt into utterly predictable rioting, looting, etc when some black person, who usually provoked a confrontation or did something stupid like fighting with or running from the police..."

Ok, he did qualify it with "usually".

I'm not sure the OP was saying the kid was up to no good in any definitive sense, but I certainly can't guess to what he meant by that. However, if you want to assume that's what he meant, then ok, I'll accept that.
 
We know the drill. I won't repeat it.

My question is why does the "community" erupt into utterly predictable rioting, looting, etc when some black person, who usually provoked a confrontation or did something stupid like fighting with or running from the police, is shot by a white, yet they are totally undisturbed by the nightly carnage of black on black violence?

The number of blacks shot by whites every year can be counted on your fingers. The body toll in Chicago alone rivals Iraq. Yet the only killings that get publicity and attract the race hustlers like Obama, Holder, Sharpton, Jackson et al are the ones involving whites killing blacks.

And why is looting a store owned by someone who had nothing to do with the incident the default method of protest? And why don't we hear the authorities from Obama on down denouncing these looters? Instead, the race hustlers encourage it. They foment riots, then demand bribes to restore "calm."

I've barely noticed the whole thing really. As long as it isn't in my neighborhood I don't care what the schvartzas do to be honest.

Most guys with families simply move somewhere safe and quiet and live normal lives far removed from these animals. On the other hand, how does an unarmed pedestrian end up shot 9 times by a cop? Fucking cops.
 
And one who doesn't know how to do a search, which I find funny.

No purpose is served by arguing with defective people. They do a good enough job of making each other feel better, so why not just leave them be? They're all relics and don't know it yet.

Why should I have to do a search to prove your points? In a debate - an official debate - it's not up to the person who asks the question to prove the assertion made by the person answering it. You and Ricter like to hide behind google a lot by telling the person asking you a question to go find the answer there. How are we to know which link you are using as your proof assertion?

Point out one time where I have avoided your question, or where I have told you to find your answer in google (not as a response in jest to you doing the same, of course).
 
And one who doesn't know how to do a search, which I find funny.

No purpose is served by arguing with defective people. They do a good enough job of making each other feel better, so why not just leave them be? They're all relics and don't know it yet.
He knows very well how to search. But only if it serves his parochial ends. If I posted the statement that car sales were up sharply, but they were down, he'd quickly post the contrary data. But if car sales are in fact up, he'll ask me for a link, lol.
 
He's enjoys playing stupid, ala "who said what? Who, me?" etc., then posing as aggrieved when he doesn't get the answer he expects, when he expects.

Child in a man's body.

It's not playing stupid. It's making sure I understand what you are saying in order to assure that I am addressing or responding to your concern/question as specifically as possible. If you weren't so obtuse, or intentionally trying to cloud the issue all the time then I wouldn't have to do that.

As for being a child, I'm at least mature enough to answer questions posed to me when they are done so. Which is more than I can say for an "adult" like yourself whose answer frequently involves "lol!" and "google".
 
He knows very well how to search. But only if it serves his parochial ends. If I posted the statement that car sales were up sharply, but they were down, he'd quickly post the contrary data. But if car sales are in fact up, he'll ask me for a link, lol.

Precisely! Because if I'm going to counter a point you make, I need a source to prove it. But going to google to find your sources is your job. Holy cow, for two supposedly intellectual "men", you two are surprisingly ignorant on debating.

But keep giving each other man-hugs in your attempt to find common ground on me. Idiocy, besides misery, it would appear, likes company.
 
I've barely noticed the whole thing really. As long as it isn't in my neighborhood I don't care what the schvartzas do to be honest.

Most guys with families simply move somewhere safe and quiet and live normal lives far removed from these animals. On the other hand, how does an unarmed pedestrian end up shot 9 times by a cop? Fucking cops.

Good question.
 
He knows very well how to search. But only if it serves his parochial ends. If I posted the statement that car sales were up sharply, but they were down, he'd quickly post the contrary data. But if car sales are in fact up, he'll ask me for a link, lol.

One would think he could find his own post with a simple keyword as easily as he can find his own ass with both hands.

But maybe not.
 
Back
Top