St. Louis Riots Follow Common Script

What do we know for sure in this case? A cop shot a young black man dead. Other than that I don't know of any absolutes for public viewing. Everything thing else is conjecture.
Questions I have. Why was the kid being questioned/detained in the first place? Police say there was a scuffle in the car and a shot was fired. Was anyone hit? Was he already in the car when the scuffle ensued? If so, why wasn't he cuffed? "Witnesses" say the kid was running away? Why? Had his hands up, but running away? That doesn't make sense. You don't put your hands up and run away. You do one or the other, but not both. Perhaps he had his arming flailing away, but that's not surrendering.
So with all the unanswered questions, why is the leftist media and Race Baiting Inc. so busy creating a cop kills innocent kid narrative? Sadly, we all know the answer. Doesn't mean the kid was unjustly gunned down by an overzealous cop, but it does mean that Race Baiting Inc. is trying to create that impression. Business as usual.
Well, one poster here is pretty sure the kid was up to no good. And he has the same lack of evidence we all do.
 
Fantasy land is always prettier.

You ignored my question, too. At least you and Ricter are consistent.

Why bother? When it gets to the point where you have no response, which comes rather quickly, you call me a homosexual commie fag and veer off into another one of your rants. You're a waste of time. When you begin to show an improved clarity in thinking, I might respond again.
 
Which poster?
Probably the one he created in his mind. You see, leftists have thing about reading comprehension. You can ask a question like, was the kid up to no good, and in the mind of the leftist you just claimed that the kid actually was up to no good. That's because they already have their minds made up and they assume you do too. This happens when you're not really interested in learning the truth. Questions are not needed under such circumstances.
 
Why bother? When it gets to the point where you have no response, which comes rather quickly, you call me a homosexual commie fag and veer off into another one of your rants. You're a waste of time. When you begin to show an improved clarity in thinking, I might respond again.

Please link to the post where I called you homosexual, a commie or a fag - or any combination of any of those.

Your refusal to answer the question the pretense of being "offended" is noted yet again. I'm sure those examples of where I called you such are coming right up.
 
Please link to the post where I called you homosexual, a commie or a fag - or any combination of any of those.

Your refusal to answer the question the pretense of being "offended" is noted yet again. I'm sure those examples of where I called you such are coming right up.

db is not a homo commie fag?

Hmm...who knew?
 
db is not a homo commie fag?

Hmm...who knew?

He could very well be, I certainly don't know. But I think it's funny that every time he avoids a serious question that I pose to him, it's always because I'm the one supposedly with no response. He's always good for a laugh!
 
You can talk to power until you're blue in the face and nothing will change. But violence works, it gets people's attention like nothing else. Dissent is typically messy, whether organized, successful, or not.
So you'd have no problem with American patriots using violence to restore our constitutional republic and remove the many corrupt incompetent career politicians in Washington?
 
In 1959, Alva Earley was denied a diploma after taking a stand against segregation. Fifty-five years later, with a little help from some determined friends, he finally received what he should've gotten a long time ago.

More than five decades ago, Earley, a then-high school senior at Galesburg High School in Illinois, attended a picnic at Lake Storey Park, according to the Register Mail. Earley, who is black, went to the picnic with a group of friends. The group, which included other black and Hispanic people, decided to eat at a whites-only area of the park, despite having been told by a school counselor that doing so would result in serious repercussions.

"We were just trying to send a message that we are people, too," Earley told NPR. "We just had lunch."

After the gathering, Earley was notified by his school that he would not be allowed to graduate, nor would he receive his diploma. Last Friday, Earley, now 73, finally received that diploma. more . . .
 
Which poster?
The OP.
"...My question is why does the "community" erupt into utterly predictable rioting, looting, etc when some black person, who usually provoked a confrontation or did something stupid like fighting with or running from the police..."

Ok, he did qualify it with "usually".
 
Back
Top