So let's assume that a trader has indeed

You guys either don't understand or haven't seen the gap between what most people do on here and actual pure day traders. Until you get to a certain point in day trading or unless you have substantial income coming from outside sources like another business than 20% a year as a day trader literally means you starve.

Even with 200k 20% would only be 40,000.00 income and you haven't even factored in data fee's, taxes and etc(even if you write off some things like data fee's or etc it's still not going to be a pure 40k). Don't have to believe me just saying it's a joke the way you guys talk about day trading. The fact is most people here, even the successful ones who everyone looks up to, can't day trade nearly as good as you think they can. A lot of them had large sums of money prior to entering the game or another business with good cash flow.

That's not to say what they are doing isn't smart, that I wouldn't do things exactly the way they are, or that there aren't a few exceptions on here. It's simply to say they aren't as talented and don't have the raw day trading capability that they would like you to believe they have.

I completely agree with you,
There's only basically one way to day trade for the retail trader. You have to be bold and aggressive and very talented....if you expect this activity to provide you income and real money for your time and efforts in it.

It's hard to get people to tell the truth and be honest with you -- but I'd personally say 99.4% of the people who attempt to day trade, or trade, are complete failures who are just wasting their time. They are better off just investing in the S&P, and doing something completely else with their time.

Some people are so proud to match the S&P, or beat it by a few %....that's laughable, sad and pathetic performance.
You have to truly amp up the risk/reward factor. and have the skill, understanding and wisdom to pull it off.
 
Last edited:
You guys either don't understand or haven't seen the gap between what most people do on here and actual pure day traders. Until you get to a certain point in day trading or unless you have substantial income coming from outside sources like another business than 20% a year as a day trader literally means you starve.

Even with 200k 20% would only be 40,000.00 income and you haven't even factored in data fee's, taxes and etc(even if you write off some things like data fee's or etc it's still not going to be a pure 40k). Don't have to believe me just saying it's a joke the way you guys talk about day trading. The fact is most people here, even the successful ones who everyone looks up to, can't day trade nearly as good as you think they can. A lot of them had large sums of money prior to entering the game or another business with good cash flow.

That's not to say what they are doing isn't smart, that I wouldn't do things exactly the way they are, or that there aren't a few exceptions on here. It's simply to say they aren't as talented and don't have the raw day trading capability that they would like you to believe they have.


I believe this is closer to the truth. Guess a real edge is hard to find in day trading or investment. Now I am inclined to think edge is a random thing and it’s very few and far between. To achieve an edge is pure luck for individuals.

Everything else can be achieved with enough time, experience and effort, such as discipline, psychology and technical skills, etc. Only edge is the elusive thing. I have read a lot about trading (and investment) in the last few decades. Looking back now everything in trading has been thoroughly discussed, studied and written except for the edge or alpha.

Even edge itself is not permanent but perishable, per the famous trading psychologist Brett Steenbarger.
 
Last edited:
Took me 20 years of never giving up to create my own system. Probably diligently spent the past 4-5 years strengthening my EQ.

It is a great feeling slowly seeing my progress to the point where I will be the GOAT......surpassing even Jim Simons. It will be take more time. But it "will" happen.
 
Last edited:
created a great trading system....solid stats....logical risk management.....proper scaling ladder.

What are the next steps for him to create his own hedge fund?

Easy..

1. Graduate from Yale or Harvard with an MBA
2. Work 5+ years for GS, MS, ML or JPM in New York until a VP
3. Leave and start Hedge Fund

You see? a very simple process. Good luck
 
Easy..

1. Graduate from Yale or Harvard with an MBA
2. Work 5+ years for GS, MS, ML or JPM in New York until a VP
3. Leave and start Hedge Fund

You see? a very simple process. Good luck


Guys like that only have insider information as their edge. Not all but the majority. Education is important but so is raw natural talent....talent can take many many different forms
 
Unfortunately, for those of us that did not take that path, that Bio gets you in the door to make your pitch.

Easy..

1. Graduate from Yale or Harvard with an MBA
2. Work 5+ years for GS, MS, ML or JPM in New York until a VP
3. Leave and start Hedge Fund

You see? a very simple process. Good luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: rb7
That is a hard question to answer, as I do not know your strategy or target investor. If you are going to target wealthy investors vs allocators, I'd say the minimum for futures would be $100K and the minimum for Equity/Options is $250,000, but they are not hard numbers. The less access you have to those that are looking to invest, the more mature the business needs to be to find investors. I have personally invested in several CTAs and Hedge funds. I invest in a business, not a trader. I want to see 12 months or more of real trading/investing/managing where they can show they can handle money and stress. The Yearly returns vs monthly changes need to fit my profile. My profile is very conservative. I look for 8% to 12% per year with very low drawdowns for the bulk of my investing. I also look for non-correlated returns to the market. It is very easy to have a great run for long manager during an up market. That does not impress me. I can do that and do not need to pay 2/20 for that.


Do you also look at MAE /MFE or just pure drawdown? Thanks
 
You guys either don't understand or haven't seen the gap between what most people do on here and actual pure day traders. Until you get to a certain point in day trading or unless you have substantial income coming from outside sources like another business than 20% a year as a day trader literally means you starve.

I needed about 10 years to become consistently profitable and make enough to quit my job. Every daytrader, successful or not, needs a period that daytrading will cost money and not bring any money, only costs. I call that an investment cost. In any business most people need time before they can live for 100% from the profits generated by their business.
I doubt that you are a successful daytrader, because these daytraders make a multiple of the 20% you mention.

The fact is most people here, even the successful ones who everyone looks up to, can't day trade nearly as good as you think they can. A lot of them had large sums of money prior to entering the game or another business with good cash flow.

At the start I overestimated myself. Daytrading looked more easy then it was. Over the years I became better and better and I started to UNDERestimate myself. What seemed impossible in the beginning (making at least 2 points ES a day net) became easy. After more than 20 years of daytrading I reached levels that went beyond the level I ever was dreaming of.
Conclusion: Over- and underestimation are changing depending on the evolution of the trader. So they are temporary and can change.

That's not to say what they are doing isn't smart, that I wouldn't do things exactly the way they are, or that there aren't a few exceptions on here. It's simply to say they aren't as talented and don't have the raw day trading capability that they would like you to believe they have.

In any profession you need basic knowledge, that you learn at school. Then you have to go to a higher level for more specific knowledge that you need for your future profession.

So when you should start the more specific knowlegde for being a daytrader, you have a problem as this education does not exist. You confuse the lack of this knowledge with not being talented. For part of the wannebee daytraders there is indeed a lack of talent, but for another part there is no lack, just the knowlegde is still missing. This missing knowledge need to be found by the daytrader himself.
What makes the numbers look bad, is the fact that you only need a PC and $500 to start daytrading. There are no other requirements. So basically even the biggest idiot can start as a daytrader. And the last years the number of daytraders went up astronomically because of the low entrey requirements. That same low level entry was the key of the success of trading crypto's. 75% of all wallets have less than $200 value.

I would like to end with a post from someone else:
Are you just trying to project your own experiences onto others? I am sorry you've had bad experience, completely aware a lot of people have. That doesn't mean because something is impossible.
 
Last edited:
I needed about 10 years to become consistently profitable and make enough to quit my job. Every daytrader, successful or not, needs a period that daytrading will cost money and not bring any money, only costs. I call that an investment cost. In any business most people need time before they can live for 100% from the profits generated by their business.
I doubt that you are a successful daytrader, because these daytraders make a multiple of the 20% you mention.



At the start I overestimated myself. Daytrading looked more easy then it was. Over the years I became better and better and I started to UNDERestimate myself. What seemed impossible in the beginning (making at least 2 points ES a day net) became easy. After more than 20 years of daytrading I reached levels that went beyond the level I ever was dreaming of.
Conclusion: Over- and underestimation are changing depending on the evolution of the trader. So they are temporary and can change.



In any profession you need basic knowledge, that you learn at school. Then you have to go to a higher level for more specific knowledge that you need for your future profession.

So when you should start the more specific knowlegde for being a daytrader, you have a problem as this education does not exist. You confuse the lack of this knowledge with not being talented. For part of the wannebee daytraders there is indeed a lack of talent, but for another part there is no lack, just the knowlegde is still missing. This missing knowledge need to be found by the daytrader himself.

I would like to end with a post from someone else:

have you successfully automate your trading system? at what age a day trader is too old to trade?
 
Back
Top