Why should I bother? Reading a study would not prove it is accurate or truthful. Do you know what an audit is? If I were auditing those reports with say a battery of doctors who are experts in their field, I would expose each one of them for the liars that they are. Like I said, those studies are not worth the paper they are printed on when other studies contract them. So, who is telling the truth? You got nothing.
The studies are undergoing peer review like all other proper papers. I doubt that any objections will be raised in peer reviews -- especially since there are other studies provided similar results at this time.
If you are claiming the the papers are not proper then you can feel free to contact the authors with your objections. This is part of the publication and review process.